45 U.S.C. § 1102

Statement of purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

It is therefore declared to be the purpose of the Congress in this subtitle to provide for—(1) the removal by a date certain of the Federal Government’s obligation to subsidize the freight operations of Conrail;(2) transfer of Conrail commuter service responsibilities to one or more entities whose principal purpose is the provision of commuter service; and(3) an orderly return of Conrail freight service to the private sector.(Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1133, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 644.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle E (§§ 1131–1169) of title XI of Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 643, known as the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Consol. Rail Corp., 580 F. Supp. 777 (D.D.C. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Consol. Rail Corp., 580 F. Supp. 777 (D.D.C. 1984). “and 45 U.S.C. §§ 1102 , 1103. Plaintiff claims that the federal government’s role as an overseer of Conrail’s operations and its substantial financial involvement with Conrail render Conrail an agency subject to the FOIA as either a “Government corporation” or a “Government…”

Verdon v. Consol. Rail Corp., 828 F. Supp. 1129 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). “45 U.S.C. § 1102 (2). This responsibility was transferred to “entities whose principal purpose [was] the provision of commuter service.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. Cnty. of Monroe, 558 F. Supp. 1387 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1983). “[2] See § 1133 of NRSA, 45 U.S.C. § 1102 . [3] Conrail Complaint ¶ 11.”

Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth., 56 F.4th 129 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “643 , 644–45 (codified at 45 U.S.C. § 1102 ). Under NERSA, Conrail would no longer provide commuter services.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. Metro-North Commuter R. Co., 598 F. Supp. 1571 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1984). “" 45 U.S.C. § 1102 (2). Section 1136 provided: Notwithstanding any other provision of law or contract, Conrail shall be relieved of any legal obligation to operate commuter service on January 1, 1983.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. United Transp. Union, 753 F. Supp. 1574 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1990). “45 U.S.C. § 1102 . b. Were Conrail’s actions “transactions” under Title VII? As a threshold matter, the unions aver that the provisions of Title VII do not apply to the instant dispute because the actions of Conrail which the unions seek to arbitrate are not “transactions,” as…”

Metro. Transp. Auth. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 792 F.2d 287 (2d Cir. 1986). “Section 1133(2) of that Act, 45 U.S.C. § 1102 (2), provided for the transfer of Conrail’s commuter service responsibilities to other entities.”

State of NJ v. Consol. Rail Corp., 690 F. Supp. 1061 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1988). “NERSA, § 1133, 45 U.S.C. § 1102 . NERSA was enacted on August 13, 1981.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.