45 U.S.C. § 1109

Effectuation of cost reductions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any cost reductions resulting from the provisions of or the amendments made by this subtitle shall not be used to limit the maximum level of any rate charged by Conrail for the provision of rail service, to limit the amount of any increase in any such rate (including rates maintained jointly by Conrail and other rail carriers), or to limit a surcharge or cancellation otherwise lawful under chapter 107 11 See References in Text note below. of title 49.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Edison Elec. Inst. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 765 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Edison Elec. Inst. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 765 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “One of several provisions in NERSA that were intended to assist Conrail in becoming profitable is section 1159, 45 U.S.C. § 1109 (1982), which specifies that [a]ny cost reductions resulting from the provisions of or the amendments made by [NERSA] shall not be used to limit the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.