45 U.S.C. § 181
Application of subchapter I to carriers by air
All of the provisions of subchapter I of this chapter except section 153 of this title are extended to and shall cover every common carrier by air engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, and every carrier by air transporting mail for or under contract with the United States Government, and every air pilot or other person who performs any work as an employee or subordinate official of such carrier or carriers, subject to its or their continuing authority to supervise and direct the manner of rendition of his service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 329
cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1943–2026 · leading case: United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258 (1947).
United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258 (1947). “§ 151 , or carriers by air as subject to Title II of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 181 . [7] The available statistics speak in terms of "strikes" for 1943 and "work stoppages arising from labor-management disputes" for 1945 and 1946.”
Osama Taha v. Int'l Bhd. of T, 947 F.3d 464 (7th Cir. 2020). “See 45 U.S.C. § 181 . 4 No. 19-1085 to remain silent” and “prevented Taha from presenting sev- eral strong and important exhibits.”
Alaska Airlines v. Judy Schurke, 898 F.3d 904 (9th Cir. 2018). “45 U.S.C. §§ 181–188. ALASKA AIRLINES V. SCHURKE 47 intended the RLA’s mandatory arbitral mechanism to be the exclusive method for resolving minor disputes, and it therefore has preemptive force.”
Jennifer Miller v. Sw. Airlines Co., 926 F.3d 898 (7th Cir. 2019). “45 U.S.C. § 181 . The answer is yes if the contentions amount to a "minor dispute"-that is, a dispute about the interpretation or application of a collective bargaining agreement.”
United Indep. Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., & Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, 756 F.2d 1274 (7th Cir. 1985). “, as made applicable to air carriers by 45 U.S.C. § 181 . Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants on Count I of the complaint, which alleges a breach of fiduciary duty under section 404 of ERISA, 29 U.”
Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, Cross v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellee, 802 F.2d 886 (7th Cir. 1986). “See 45 U.S.C. § 181 (providing that 45 U.S.C.”
Repub. Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 (1965). “1189 , 45 U. S. C. § 181 (1958 ed.). [11] Alabama law does not require exhaustion of grievance procedures and arbitration in a case like this one.”
Thibodeaux v. Exec. Jet Internaional, Inc., 328 F.3d 742 (5th Cir. 2003). “45 U.S.C. § 181 . 3 . See 14 C.F.R. §§ 91 , 135.”
Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Miller, 523 U.S. 866 (1998). “[1] II A Because Delta is a "common carrier by air engaged in interstate or foreign commerce," 45 U. S. C. § 181 , the RLA governs its bargaining relationship with ALPA.”
Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Ted Cheatham, 910 F.3d 751 (4th Cir. 2018). “, 45 U.SC. § 181 (2012) (Railway Labor Act); 47 U.”
Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 394 U.S. 369 (1969). “1189 , 45 U. S. C. §§ 181 , 182. [17] In the context of labor relations law, this word is fraught with ambiguity.”
Wisconsin Cent., Ltd. v. Shannon, 539 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2008). “1189 (codified as amended at 45 U.S.C. §§ 181— 188)). 2 . This Court has found “the preemption question sufficiently similar to the preclusion question to make the analysis employed in the RLA preemption cases applicable” in preclusion cases as well.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.