45 U.S.C. § 57
Who included in term “common carrier”
The term “common carrier” as used in this chapter shall include the receiver or receivers or other persons or corporations charged with the duty of the management and operation of the business of a common carrier.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1927–2024 · leading case: Sean Greene v. Long Island R.R. Co., Barbara A. Arias, Thelma Schulman, Metro. Transp. Auth., 280 F.3d 224 (2d Cir. 2002).
Sean Greene v. Long Island R.R. Co., Barbara A. Arias, Thelma Schulman, Metro. Transp. Auth., 280 F.3d 224 (2d Cir. 2002). “corporations charged with the duty of the management and operation of the business of a common carrier,” 45 U.S.C. § 57 , we turn to the question of whether MTA is within the scope of FELA as a manager or operator of LIRR’s business.”
Cox v. Roth, 348 U.S. 207 (1955). “66 , 45 U. S. C. § 57 . Since railroads are rarely, if ever, *209 owned by individuals, and since they are subject to various regulations which prevent their discontinuing business, a clause permitting suit against the personal representative of the individual owner of a…”
Joseph Mattingly v. R.J. Corman R.R. Grp., LLC, 90 F.4th 478 (6th Cir. 2024). “” 45 U.S.C. § 57 . Mattingly’s unitary theory relies on two early-twentieth-century Supreme Court cases: Southern Pacific Terminal Co.”
Thaxton v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 520 S.E.2d 735 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “45 USC § 57 , which neither party cites, provides the critical definition of “common carrier” for purposes of FELA.”
Capasso v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 198 F. Supp. 2d 452 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “” 45 U.S.C. § 57 . The issue of whether the MTA is subject to FELA is currently pending before the Second Circuit in Greene v.”
Donovan v. Agnew, 712 F.2d 1509 (1st Cir. 1983). “§ 186 , which incorporates the NLRA’s definition of “employer”, and to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 57 , whose provisions are less analogous.”
Wallace P. Aho v. Erie Mining Co., 466 F.2d 539 (8th Cir. 1972). “The Federal Employers’ Liability Act imposes liability on a common carrier by railroad for damages suffered by its employees while so employed. 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 .”
Eddings v. Collins Pine Co., 140 F. Supp. 622 (N.D. Cal. 1956). “That the Act contemplated such a situation is apparent from Section 7, 45 U.S.C.A. § 57 , which states: “The term ‘common carrier’ as used in this chapter shall include the receiver or receivers or other persons or corporations charged with the duty of the management and…”
O'BRIEN v. Watco Contract Switching, Inc., 802 N.E.2d 999 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). “45 U.S.C. § 57 provides that "[t]he term 'common carrier as used in this chapter shall include the receiver or receivers or other persons or corporations charged with the duty of the management and operation of the business of a common carrier.”
Checuti v. Conrail, 291 F. Supp. 2d 664 (N.D. Ohio 2003). “The Court also observes that 45 U.S.C. § 57 provides: The term "common carrier” as used in this chapter shall include the receiver or receivers or other persons or corporations charged with the duty of the management and operation of the business of a common carrier.”
Est. of Anderson v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., 567 S.E.2d 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “It merely operated a locomotive on its own property to load rail cars with its own product. There is no evidence that Martin Marietta had any ownership interest in CSXT.”
In re Chicago, Missouri & W. Ry. Co., 133 B.R. 438 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1991). “” 45 U.S.C. § 57 . In support of this position, Banemidwest cites Eddings v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.