U.S. Code » Title 45 » Chapter CHAPTER 17— RAILROAD REVITALIZATION AND REGULATORY REFORM › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— GENERAL PROVISIONS

45 U.S.C. § 803

Repealed. Pub. L. 97–449, § 7(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2443

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1980–1995 · leading case: Fullilove v. Klutznick
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fullilove v. Klutznick (1980) scotus · cites it 6× “These categories also are classified as minorities in the regulations implementing the nondiscrimination requirements of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 45 U. S. C. § 803 , see 49 CFR § 265.5 (i) (1978), on which Congress relied as precedent for…”
Organization of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad (1983) ilnd · cites it 11× “45 U.S.C. § 803 . The legislative history indicates that the non-discrimination provision was enacted as part of “an established national policy, since at least the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, to encourage and assist in the development of minority business…”
Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York City (1983) scotus “§ 6870 (a) (Energy Conservation and Resources Renewal Act of 1976); 45 U. S. C. § 803 (Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act).”
Central Alabama Paving, Inc. v. James (1980) almd · cites it 2× “Section 905 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 ( 45 U.S.C. § 803 ); 2. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.”
Mikkilineni v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (1980) paed · cites it 2× “§ 1985 (3), Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, 45 U.S.C. § 803 (a) (which prohibits discrimination by recipients of federal funds) and regulations promulgated thereunder, review of agency action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”
Hamilton v. Illinois Central Railroad (1995) mssd “Initially, Hamilton attempted to characterize ICR as a “recipient” within the meaning of the Rehabilitation Act by alleging that ICR “received federal financial assistance, under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (“4-R Act”), 45 U.S.C. § 803 et seq.…”
S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Fulton County (1987) gand “For example, the court in Central Alabama Paving analyzed the language of section 905 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act (RRA) of 1976, 45 U.S.C. § 803 . The court concluded that the RRA was not a “conscious conferral of authority” by Congress because…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.