Notes of Decisions
Shipbuilders Council of Am., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 481 F. Supp. 2d 550 (E.D. Va. 2007).
· cites it 3× “” 46 U.S.C. § 12101 (a). Thus, the Jones Act provides that if a vessel is “entirely rebuilt” outside of the United States, it is considered to be “rebuilt foreign,” and thus, ineligible for coastwise trading privileges.”
Mullane v. Chambers, 438 F.3d 132 (1st Cir. 2006).
“See 46 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. See also National Vessel Documentation Center: Frequently Asked Questions, at http://www.”
State v. Zach, 502 A.2d 896 (Conn. 1985).
“We can only assume that these vessels are now registered under 46 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. (1983). Since the defendants claim, *175 in part, that General Statutes § 15-142 is “contrary to the established federal system of admiralty jurisdiction”; see footnote 1, supra, question…”
Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. Portland, 288 F. Supp. 3d 321 (D. Me. 2017).
“Fifth, the City disputes the applicability of PPLC's statutory citations, the federal coastwise endorsements granted under 46 U.S.C. § 12101 , et seq. Id. at 52 . The City says that "[a] coastwise endorsement is an initial, threshold authorization for a vessel to engage in trade…”
Alaska Excursion Cruises, Inc. v. United States, 603 F. Supp. 541 (D.D.C. 1984).
“84-0889 alleges that the Coast Guard, faced with evidence of foreign ownership, violated its regulations, the Vessel Documentation Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 12101 , et seq., and Section 802(a) of the Shipping Act, 46 U.”
Magic II, Inc. v. Dubno, 537 A.2d 998 (Conn. 1988).
“We can only assume that these vessels are now registered under 46 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. (1983). Since the defendants claim, in part, that General Statutes § 15-142 is ‘contrary to the established federal system of admiralty jurisdiction’ .”
Norfolk Dredging Co. v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 167 (Fed. Cl. 2003).
“Customs announced a four-element test that allows: 1) non-hopper dredges; 2) documented under 46 U.S.C. § 12101 ; 3) chartered to Stuyvesant Dredging Company to fulfill obligations under a specific contract; which 4) is completed prior to December 8, 2022, or when STUYVESANT…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.