46 U.S.C. § 30907
Procedure for hearing and determination
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
30907(a) | 46 App.:743 (1st, 4th sentences). | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, § 3 (1st, 4th–6th sentences), 41 Stat. 526. |
30907(b) | 46 App.:743 (5th, 6th sentences). | |
In subsection (a), the text of 46 App. U.S.C. 743 (4th sentence) is omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (b)(1)(A), the words “plaintiff” and “complaint” are substituted for “libelant” and “libel”, respectively, for consistency with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.).
In subsection (b)(2), the words “in any proper case” are omitted as unnecessary.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2013–2016 · leading case: In re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co., 194 F. Supp. 3d 766 (N.D. Ill. 2016).
In re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co., 194 F. Supp. 3d 766 (N.D. Ill. 2016). “” 46 U.S.C. § 30907 (a). The Court does not, however, read this provision as requiring the Court to ignore the unique character of suits against the United States.”
Shaver Transp. Co. v. United States, 948 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Or. 2013). “The Eleventh Circuit in Stevens held that a subcontractor could bring an in person-am action against the United States based on in rem principles, as provided for in 46 U.S.C. § 30907 (b)(1)(B). Section 30907, a provision of the SAA, is incorporated by the PVA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.