47 U.S.C. § 1441

State and Local Implementation Fund

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 47 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the State and Local Implementation Fund.

(b) Amounts available for State and Local Implementation Grant Program

Any amounts borrowed under subsection (c)(1) and any amounts in the State and Local Implementation Fund that are not necessary to reimburse the general fund of the Treasury for such borrowed amounts shall be available to the Assistant Secretary to implement section 1442 of this title.

Prior to the end of fiscal year 2022, the Assistant Secretary may borrow from the general fund of the Treasury such sums as may be necessary, but not to exceed $135,000,000, to implement section 1442 of this title.

(2) Reimbursement

The Assistant Secretary shall reimburse the general fund of the Treasury, without interest, for any amounts borrowed under paragraph (1) as funds are deposited into the State and Local Implementation Fund.

(d) Transfer of unused funds

If there is a balance remaining in the State and Local Implementation Fund on September 30, 2022, the Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer such balance to the general fund of the Treasury, where such balance shall be dedicated for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.

(Pub. L. 112–96, title VI, § 6301, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 218.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2002 · leading case: In Re Universal Serv. Fund Tel. Billing Practices Litig., 247 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Kan. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Universal Serv. Fund Tel. Billing Practices Litig., 247 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Kan. 2002). “on 1441(a) provides, in pertinent part: Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the…”

Myhre v. AT & T, 247 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Kan. 2002). “” 47 U.S.C. § 1441 (a). . As the Supreme Court explained with regard to "federal question” jurisdiction: "There is no ‘single, precise' definition of that concept; rather, ‘the phrase arising under masks a welter of issues regarding the interrelation of federal and state…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.