47 U.S.C. § 15

Reservation of power to alter, amend, or repeal act; power to fix rates and purchase lines

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 47 CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in sections 9 to 15 of this title shall be construed to affect or impair the right of Congress, at any time hereafter, to alter, amend, or repeal sections 1 to 6 and 8 11 See References in Text note below. of this title; and sections 9 to 15 of this title shall be subject to alteration, amendment, or repeal as, in the opinion of Congress, justice or the public welfare may require; and nothing herein contained shall be held to deny, exclude, or impair any right or remedy in the premises now or hereafter existing in the United States, or the authority of the Federal Communications Commission under the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended [47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], to prescribe charges, classifications, regulations, and practices, including priorities, applicable to Government communications.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–2008 · leading case: South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. LOUISIANA, ETC., 412 So. 2d 1069 (La. 1982).
South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. LOUISIANA, ETC., 412 So. 2d 1069 (La. 1982). “to regulation and, if so, to what extent, b) to examine the competitive and technological evolution of customer premises equipment, with a view toward determining whether the continuation of traditional regulation of terminal equipment is in the public interest; and c) to…”
Farina v. Nokia, 578 F. Supp. 2d 740 (E.D. Pa. 2008). “The district court went beyond this restricted inquiry and in effect anticipated (1) that Nokia would raise the affirmative defense that the state law claims are preempted by the [Federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 15 et seq. (“FCA”) ] *746 and federal RF radiation…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.