47 U.S.C. § 609
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Communications Act of 1934.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Global Crossing Telecomm., Inc. v. Metrophones Telecomm., Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007).
Global Crossing Telecomm., Inc. v. Metrophones Telecomm., Inc., 550 U.S. 45 (2007). “56 , 47 U.S.C. § 609 et seq. Neither Congress nor the Commission, however, totally abandoned traditional regulatory requirements.”
Qwest Commc'ns Int'l, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 240 F.3d 886 (10th Cir. 2001). “See the historical and statutory notes to 47 U.S.C. § 609 for a list of the sections enacted by the Act and those sections amended by the Act.”
At&t Commc'ns of Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co. & Ameritech Corp., 349 F.3d 402 (7th Cir. 2003). “§ 609 note (“This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not be construed to modify, impair, or supersede Federal, State, or local law unless expressly so provided in such Act or amendments”), which precludes a reading that ousts the state legislature by implication.”
Milo v. Martin, 311 S.W.3d 210 (Tex. App. 2010). “[3] See the historical and statutory notes ("1996 Amendments") to 47 U.S.C.A. § 609 (West 2001), for a list of the sections referenced as the "Communications Decency Act of 1996.”
Michigan Bell Tel. Co. v. MFS Intelenet of Michigan, Inc., 16 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Mich. 1998). “See the notes accompanying 47 U.S.C. § 609 for a listing of the specific sections affected.”
New England Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 570 F. Supp. 1558 (D. Me. 1983). “§ 401 (b) (1962) of the Communications Act of 1934 (the “Act”), see 47 U.S.C.A. § 609 (Supp.1983), to achieve enforcement of a certain order of the Federal Communications Commission.”
Cmty. Telecable of Seattle, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 136 Wash. App. 169 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “In Brand X, the Court considered whether the Federal Communications Commission’s classification of broadband cable modem service under the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 609 , as an “information service” rather than a “telecommunications service” was…”
United States v. Any & All Radio Station Transmission Equip., 19 F. Supp. 2d 738 (E.D. Mich. 1998). “47 U.S.C. § 609 . 2 . An FM translator is a low power radio station that receives the signal of a Ml power station and simultaneously rebroadcasts the signal on a different frequency.”
Ballard RN Ctr., Inc. v. Kohll's Pharmacy & Homecare, Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 131543 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “¶ 41 However, the legislative history of the TCPA belies the assertion that class action lawsuits in TCPA cases are against congressional intent.”
Arkow v. Comm'r, 2016 T.C. Summary Opinion 87 (Tax Ct. 2016). “In December 2011 petitioner husband filed a complaint against Wyndham in the Superior Court of California for Los *88 Angeles, California, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) , 47 U.S.C. sec. 227 (2012) .”
Cohen v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “” 47 U.S.C. § 609 . The Telecommunications Act of 1996 contained provisions that amended the Communications Act of 1934 and provisions that did not.”
Doe v. Wentzville R-IV Sch. Dist. (E.D. Mo. 2024). “2 See 47 U.S.C. § 609 note (Short Title of 2000 Amendment); see also Anuj C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.