49 U.S.C. § 32701
Findings and purposes
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
32701(a) | 15:1981 (1st sentence). | Oct. 20, 1972, Pub. L. 92–513, § 401, 86 Stat. 961. |
32701(b) | 15:1981 (last sentence). | |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 98
cases (29 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp., 691 S.E.2d 135 (S.C. 2010).
Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp., 691 S.E.2d 135 (S.C. 2010). “" 49 U.S.C. § 32701 (b). To accomplish these express goals, the Act imposes various requirements on persons transferring motor vehicles.”
Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc., 225 P.3d 266 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “8 49 U.S.C. § 32701 (b). “[T]he Act is intended to prohibit the giving of false odometer statements even by those who had nothing to do with changing the odometers.”
Glendale Owens v. Samkle Auto. Inc., 425 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2005). “PER CURIAM: Glendale Owens appeals the dismissal of her amended complaint alleging that Sam-kle Automotive violated the federal Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (the “Odometer Act” or the “Act”), 49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq. 1 Title 49, section 32710(a) of the United States…”
Garry Ioffe v. Skokie Motor Sales, Inc., Doing Bus. as Sherman Dodge, 414 F.3d 708 (7th Cir. 2005). “5 (c), a regulation promulgated under the federal Odometer Act, 49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq., his claim is wholly unrelated to the vehicle’s odometer or mileage.”
Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 2d 535 (E.D. Va. 2001). “See 49 U.S.C. §§ 32701 et seq. (West 1999 & Supp.”
David J. Diersen v. Chicago Car Exch., 110 F.3d 481 (7th Cir. 1997). “49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq. (formerly 15 U.”
A.J.'s Auto. Sales, Inc. v. Freet, 725 N.E.2d 955 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). “The Freets claimed that New *961 man was liable under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (the Odometer Act), codified at 49 U.S.C. § 32701 , et seq., and the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act (the Deceptive Sales Act), codified at Ind.”
Tripp v. Charlie Falk's Auto Wholesale Inc., 290 F. App'x 622 (4th Cir. 2008). “, and the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (the “Federal Odometer Act” or “FOA”), 49 U.S.C. § 32701 , et seq. Appellants Arthur and Linda Tripp (the “Tripps”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and the granting of Charlie Falk…”
Miller's Apple Valley Chevrolet Olds-Geo, Inc., a West Virginia Corp. v. Mark Goodwin, 177 F.3d 232 (4th Cir. 1999). “OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972, 49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq., requires that the court award costs and reasonable attorney’s fees “to the person when a [civil] judgment is entered for that person.”
Bodine v. Graco, Inc., 533 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2008). “49 U.S.C. § 32701 . Congress finds that — • (1) buyers of motor vehicles rely heavily on the odometer reading as an index of the condition and value of a vehicle; (2) buyers are entitled to rely on the odometer reading as an accurate indication of the mileage of the vehicle;…”
Akishev v. Kapustin, 23 F. Supp. 3d 440 (D.N.J. 2014). “at ¶¶ 287-304), and the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 32701 et seq. (id. at ¶¶ 317-319), in addition to various other state law torts.”
Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc., 578 N.W.2d 222 (Iowa 1998). “49 U.S.C. § 32701 . The act defines “motor vehicle” as follows: “Motor vehicle” means a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 32701(a) — 1 case
Matthew Teel v. Autonation Motors, LLC (Tex. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.