5 U.S.C. § 1101
Office of Personnel Management
The Office of Personnel Management is an independent establishment in the executive branch. The Office shall have an official seal, which shall be judicially noticed, and shall have its principal office in the District of Columbia, and may have field offices in other appropriate locations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 280
cases (64 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4044 (2017).
Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4044 (2017). “This case concerns the proper forum for judicial review when a federal employee complains of a serious adverse employment action taken against him, one falling within the compass of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., and attributes the action,…”
Elgin v. Dep't of the Treasury, 132 S. Ct. 2126 (2012). “Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), 5 U. S. C. §1101 et seq., certain federal employees may obtain administrative and judicial review of specified ad- verse employment actions.”
Townsend v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D.D.C. 2017). “Under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (the "CSRA”), 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., employees have the right to appeal certain agency personnel actions "[i]f (but only if) the action is particularly serious.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Gregory, 534 U.S. 1 (2001). “[4] The petition for certiorari and the brief for petitioner state the question presented as follows: "Whether a federal agency, when disciplining or removing an employee for misconduct pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U. S. C. § 1101 et seq., may take account…”
Stuttering Found. of Am. v. Springer, 498 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D.D.C. 2007). “1329 -391, 1329-423 (1987) (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (note)). SFA filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction concurrently with its complaint on July 11, 2007.”
Dews-Miller v. Clinton, 707 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2010). “, and in related violations of the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.”
Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 713 F.3d 1111 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “II The first issue we must address is whether this court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s ruling under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. Resolving that question requires a brief discussion of the options open to a federal employee complaining of…”
Kaplan v. Conyers, 733 F.3d 1148 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “In my view, the DoD has acted without authority from either the President or Congress, and contrary to the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (“CSRA”), 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. In essence, the majority’s decision rests on the flawed premise that the DoD, acting on its own—without…”
Garcia v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 437 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “1111 (codified at 5 U.S.C. §§ 1101 , 1201 (2000)). Congress gave the Board the responsibility, inter alia, to adjudicate appeals of adverse personnel actions taken by a federal agency against its employees.”
Kloeckner v. Solis, 133 S. Ct. 596 (2012). “I A The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), 5 U. S. C. § 1101 et seq., establishes a framework for evaluating personnel actions taken against federal employees.”
Gen. Acct. Off. v. Gen. Acct. Off. Pers. Appeals Bd., Morris L. Shaller, Intervenor, 698 F.2d 516 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “325-327 (1979), reprinted in 5 U.S.C. § 1101 note at 149-50 (Supp. V 1981).”
Thayne Griener v. United States, 900 F.3d 700 (5th Cir. 2018). “2008), determined that it did not have subject-matter jurisdiction, because the Civil Service Reform Act ("CSRA"), 5 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. , preempted Dr. Griener's claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.