U.S. Code
»
Title 5
» PART III— EMPLOYEES › Subpart B— Employment and Retention › CHAPTER 33— EXAMINATION, SELECTION, AND PLACEMENT › SUBCHAPTER III— DETAILS, VACANCIES, AND APPOINTMENTS
Notes of Decisions
In re Grand Jury Investigation, 315 F. Supp. 3d 602 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
· cites it 3× “at 935 ; see also 5 U.S.C. § 3347 (a)(1)(B) (recognizing that a statute "designat[ing] an officer or employee to perform the functions and duties of a specified office" can make one an "acting official"); English v.”
In re Grand Jury Investigation, 916 F.3d 1047 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
“5 U.S.C. § 3347 (a)(1)(B). Other statutes may temporarily authorize an officer or employee to perform the functions and duties of a specified office.”
SW Gen., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 796 F.3d 67 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
“105— 120, at 16 (FVRA does not override appointment provision in NLRA (referencing 5 U.S.C. § 3347 (a)(1)(A))). The President did not invoke the NLRA when appointing Solomon, however — perhaps because the FVRA allows an acting officer to serve for a longer period of time.”
Olympic Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Dir., Off. of Thrift Supervision, 732 F. Supp. 1183 (D.D.C. 1990).
“Martoche as Acting Director pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 3347 is improper. According to Olympic, section 3347 does not give the President authority to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of any person other than a constitutionally appointed officer.”
United States v. Patara, 365 F. Supp. 3d 1085 (S.D. Cal. 2019).
“5 U.S.C. § 3347 . The plain meaning of the text does not support Defendants' argument.”
United States v. Julien Giraud, Jr., 160 F.4th 390 (3d Cir. 2025).
· cites it 4× “The FVRA is “the exclusive means for temporarily authorizing an acting official to perform the functions and duties of any [PAS] office,” 5 U.S.C. § 3347 (a), unless a statute expressly authorizes another means of acting or interim service in a specified office, id.”
5 U.S.C. § 3347(a): 1 case
5 U.S.C. § 3347(a)(1): 1 case
5 U.S.C. § 3347(b): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.