5 U.S.C. § 4305
Regulations
The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1980–2011 · leading case: Paul Lawrence v. Vernon D. Acree, 665 F.2d 1319 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
Paul Lawrence v. Vernon D. Acree, 665 F.2d 1319 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “” 5 U.S.C. § 4305 (c), (d) (1976). 4 Lawrence notes that *1323 section 1985(1) promotes different policies, involves different elements of proof, and provides for judicial trial and a distinct form of relief — damages—than does the remedy under the Performance Act.”
Salmon v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 663 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “5 U.S.C. § 4305 (2006). The OPM regulations place final authority for performance standards with the agency: Performance standard means the management-approved expression of the performance threshold(s), requirements), or expectation(s) that must be met to be appraised at a…”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 30 F.3d 1510 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 4305 , 4506. According to this regulation, “The decision to grant a performance award, including the amount of such award, shall be reviewed and approved by an official of the agency who is at a higher level than the official who made the initial decision, unless…”
Farshy v. Campbell, 638 F.2d 829 (5th Cir. 1981). “We agree with the district court that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the agency’s action.”
Adamsen v. Dep't of Agric., 563 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “Pursuant to statutory rule-making authority, 5 U.S.C. § 4305 , OPM has promulgated regulations that specify the numerous requirements for such systems, 5 C.”
Wallen v. Domm, 532 F. Supp. 73 (E.D. Va. 1982). “, 5 U.S.C. § 4305 (a) (agency, on request of employee, shall provide one impartial review of performance rating); 5 C.”
Larry R. Burton v. Martin H. Lobdell, 627 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “5 U.S.C. § 4305 (1976). 2 . Section 4307 of the Act provides: An employee may not be given a performance rating, regardless of the name given to the rating, and a rating may not be used as a basis for any action, except under a performance-rating plan approved by the Civil…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.