5 U.S.C. § 5503
Recess appointments
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| R.S. § 1761. | |
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases, 1977–2018 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning, 134 S. Ct. 2550 (2014).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning, 134 S. Ct. 2550 (2014). “And even where the President and Senate are at odds over politically sensitive appointments, compromise is normally possible.”
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “” The Evans, Woodley, and Allocco courts all relied on supposed congressional acquiescence in the practice of making recess appointments to offices that were vacant prior to the recess because 5 U.S.C. § 5503 permits payment to such appointees in some circumstances.”
Evans v. Stephens, 387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004). “See 5 U.S.C. § 5503 (1996) (discussing salary requirements for officers appointed to fill a vacancy that existed while Senate was in session).”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab., 719 F.3d 203 (3rd Cir. 2013). “5 U.S.C. § 5503 ; see Evans, 387 F.3d at 1226 ; Woodley, 751 F.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enter. Leasing Co. Se., LLC, 722 F.3d 609 (4th Cir. 2013). “The Pay Act, originally enacted during the Civil War and currently codified as 5 U.S.C. § 5503 , provides for the payment of salaries to recess appointees who fill vacancies that first arise while the Senate is in session.”
United States v. Janet Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985). “5 U.S.C. § 5503 ; see also S.Res. 334, 86th Cong.”
Staebler v. Carter, 464 F. Supp. 585 (D.D.C. 1979). “The Recess Appointments Clause was first drafted in Hamilton’s plan of government, adopted upon motion of Richard Spaight of North Carolina, and left unchanged by the Committee of Style.”
Dennis v. Luis, 741 F.2d 628 (3rd Cir. 1984). “3 and 5 U.S.C. § 5503 combined, which provide: Art.”
Kopp v. Schrader, 187 A.3d 88 (Md. 2018). “It is not unusual for a legislative body to enforce a constitutional advice and consent role through the exercise of its fiscal powers.”
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 865 F. Supp. 891 (D.D.C. 1994). “646 (1863), currently codified at 5 U.S.C. § 5503 (1982). With certain limitations, this Act prohibits payment of money from the Treasury to recess appointees when the vacancy to which they were appointed existed while Congress was in session.”
Baney v. Dep't of Just., 263 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “5 U.S.C. § 5503 (c). The only issue in this appeal is whether the Board correctly interpreted section 6323(b) to disqualify voluntary service from leave under that section.”
Asatov v. Dep't of Labor, 542 F. App'x 930 (Fed. Cir. 2013). “5 U.S.C. § 5503 (c); see also Hayes v. Dep’t of the Navy, 727 F.”
— 5 U.S.C. § 5503(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.