5 U.S.C. § 5923
Quarters allowances
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| Sept. 6, 1960, Pub. L. 86–707, § 211, 74 Stat. 793. | |
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
1991—Pub. L. 102–138 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted “subsistence” for “lodging” and inserted “(including meals and laundry expenses)” after “quarters” in par. (1), substituted “90 days” for “3 months” in par. (1)(A), substituted “30 days” for “1 month” in par. (1)(B), and added subsec. (b).
1982—Par. (2). Pub. L. 97–258 substituted “section 3324(a) and (b)” for “section 529”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1971–2022 · leading case: Roberts v. United States
Roberts v. United States (2012)
“This is an action by a civilian Marine Corps employee seeking the payment of a living quarters allowance (“LQA”) as provided by 5 U.S.C. § 5923 (2006). Although the Marine Corps neither offered nor advertised the payment of LQA for this particular job posting, plaintiff contends…”
Salvatore Bortone v. United States (2013)
“Living Quarters Allowance eligibility under the Overseas Differentials and Allowances Act; 5 U.S.C. § 5923 ; Department of State Standardized Regulations §§ 031.”
Roberts v. United States (2014)
“5 U.S.C. § 5923 (a) (emphasis added). The Act also delegated the authority to promulgate requirements for LQA to the President, stating that: (c) The allowances and differentials authorized by this subehapter shall be paid under regulations prescribed by the President.”
Pucilowski v. Department of Justice (2007)
“2000) (finding that the living quarter allowance provided to members of the armed forces under 5 U.S.C. § 5923 (a)(2) is a “benefit of employment”).”
Anderson v. United States (1989)
“1 These allowances were generally paid to all civilian federal government employees stationed overseas when government-owned or rental quarters were not provided without charge for a government employee in a foreign area as authorized by the Overseas Differentials and Allowances…”
Adde v. United States (2008)
“The first, 5 U.S.C. § 5923 (2000), governs living quarters allowances related to the cost of obtaining housing overseas, an allowance not at issue here.”
Lawrence v. United States (2006)
“5 U.S.C. § 5923 (a)(2). LQA is limited to actual, allowable costs for rent and utilities, or maximum rate for the post, whichever is less.”
Noel D. Induni and Janet E. Induni v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1993)
“Induni received an LQA in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 5923 (2) (1988). An LQA is a stipend that is provided to qualifying federal employees stationed abroad who are not otherwise provided with housing.”
Boston v. United States (1999)
“See 5 U.S.C. §§ 5923 (a)(2), 5924(1). The rates of the allowances are determined by the Department of State (“DoS”) and Department of Defense (“DoD”) implementing regulations.”
Hindman v. United States (2017)
“In Roberts , the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Overseas Differential and Allowances Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5923 , and implementing regulations, promulgated by the Department of State and the Department of Defense, and an Order issued by a Marine…”
Murphy v. United States (2017)
“See 5 U.S.C. § 5923 (a)(2) (authorizing a “living quarters allowance for rent, heat, light, fuel, gas, electricity, and water”).”
Matthew Walter Stephan v. United States (2013)
“DAMICH, Judge Plaintiff, Matthew Stephan (“Stephan”), pro se, brings this action alleging that he is entitled to a Living Quarter Allowance (“LQA”), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5923 . The case is now before the Court on the United States’ (the “Government”) motion to dismiss for lack…”
— 5 U.S.C. § 5923(a) — 1 case
Thomas v. United States (2015)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.