5 U.S.C. § 8451
Disability retirement
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 104
cases (53 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: William A. Anthony v. Office of Personnel Management
William A. Anthony v. Office of Personnel Management (1995)
“5 U.S.C. §§ 8451 (a)(1)(A), 8451(c). However, the statute provides that an employee will not be eligible for such disability retirement if the employee “has declined a reasonable offer of reassignment to a vacant position in the employee’s agency for which the employee is…”
Gooden v. Office of Personnel Management (2006)
“at 6-7 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 8451 ; 5 C.F.R. § 844.103 (a); Wilkey-Marzin v.”
Thomas N. Trevan v. Office of Personnel Management (1995)
“514, 516, codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 8451 , for the purpose of determining entitlement to a FERS disability annuity.”
Solomon v. Vilsack (2010)
“” 5 U.S.C. § 8451 (a)(1)(A)-(B). Under Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations, employees are eligible for the benefits only if accommodating their disabilities would be “unreasonable.”
Wayne B. Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs (1998)
“Harris arises under 5 U.S.C. § 8451 (a)(1)(A) (1994), which authorizes the agency to file a disability retirement application for an employee.”
Szejner v. Office of Personnel Management (2006)
“at 7 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 8451 (a)(1); 5 C.F.R. § 844.103 (a)(2)).”
United States Ex Rel. Loughren v. Unum Group (2010)
“An individual can receive FERS benefits without meeting a definition of disability as stringent as SSDI's "any occupation” standard, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 8451 (a)(1)(B), 8451(a)(2)(A), 5 C.”
People v. Hamilton (2018)
“) In an amicus brief, the San Diego County District Attorney (District Attorney) disagrees with the People's concession that insufficient evidence supports Hamilton's conviction under Insurance Code section 1871.”
Gonzagowski v. Widnall (1997)
“§ 8337 or 5 U.S.C. § 8451 .... 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203 (g) (emphasis added).”
Bennett v. Henderson (1998)
“§ 8337 or 5 U.S.C. § 8451 . In addition § 1614.203(g) imposes an obligation on the federal employer to offer reassignment, unless the employer has already posted the position as available: If the agency has already posted a notice or announcement seeking applications for a…”
Solomon v. Vilsack (2009)
“” See 5 U.S.C. § 8451 (a)(1). The Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), the agency responsible for administering *60 FERS, has promulgated implementing regulations providing that FERS disability benefits are only available if “[ajccommo-dation of the disabling medical…”
Yahle v. Office of Personnel Management (2002)
“5 U.S.C. § 8451 (a)(1)(A). The more months worked, however, the more an employee who qualifies for these benefits will actually receive in terms of monthly payments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.