50 U.S.C. § 1812
Statement of exclusive means by which electronic surveillance and interception of certain communications may be conducted
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 95–511,
Amendment by Pub. L. 110–261 effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Legal Issues Relating to the Testing, Use, & Deployment of an Intrusion-detection Sys. (EINSTEIN 2.0) to Protect Unclassified Comput. Networks in the Exec. Branch (OLC 2009).
Legal Issues Relating to the Testing, Use, & Deployment of an Intrusion-detection Sys. (EINSTEIN 2.0) to Protect Unclassified Comput. Networks in the Exec. Branch (OLC 2009). “§ 1801 (f), “except as authorized” by FISA, the Wiretap Act, the SCA, the Pen/Trap Act, or any other “express statutory authorization that is an additional exclusive means for conducting electronic surveillance” under 50 U.S.C.A. § 1812 (b) (West 2008). See also id.”
Use of the EINSTEIN 2.0 Intrusion-Detection Sys. to Protect Unclassified Comput. Networks in the Exec. Branch (OLC 2009). “§ 1801 (f ) (2006), “except as authorized” by FISA, the Wiretap Act, the SCA, the Pen/Trap Act, or any other “express statutory authorization that is an additional exclusive means for conducting electronic surveillance” under 50 U.S.C. § 1812 (b) (Supp. II 2008). See also id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.