50 U.S.C. § 201
IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO AFFILIATED NETWORKS OF HIZBALLAH FOR TRANSNATIONAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES.
“(a)In General.—The President shall, on or after the date of the enactment of the Hizballah International Financing Prevention Amendments Act of 2018 [Oct. 25, 2018], impose the sanctions described in subsection (b) with respect to affiliated networks of Hizballah, including, as appropriate, by reason of significant transnational criminal activities engaged in by such networks.“(b)Sanctions Described.—The sanctions described in this subsection are sanctions applicable with respect to Hizballah pursuant to any provision of law, including Executive Order 13581 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking property of transnational criminal organizations) (as such Executive Order was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the Hizballah International Financing Prevention Amendments Act of 2018).“(c)Waiver.—The President may, for periods not to exceed 180 days, waive the imposition of sanctions under this section if the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that such waiver is in the national security interests of the United States.“(d)Definitions.—In this section:“(1)Appropriate congressional committees.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—“(A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Ways and Means, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Financial Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and“(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.“(2)Hizballah.—The term ‘Hizballah’ has the meaning given such term in section 102(e).
Notes of Decisions
Zimmerman v. Walker, 132 F.2d 442 (9th Cir. 1942).
· cites it 2× “§ 81a; and 50 U.S.C.A. § 201 , 202. However, calling forth the militia, and the imposition of a military government are two different things.”
Ex Parte Green, 123 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1941).
“The provision in § 304(b) of the Act for quotas, in which reference is made to “the several States, Territories, and the District of Columbia,” was intended merely to determine such quotas, and cannot reasonably be said to imply that, for the purpose of determining the persons…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.