50 U.S.C. § 3001
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “National Security Act of 1947”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2014–2019 · leading case: Aron Dibacco v. United States Army, 795 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
Aron Dibacco v. United States Army, 795 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “The CIA relied on the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3001 et seq., to justify withholding information that would reveal *197 intelligence sources and methods.”
Leopold v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 380 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “Exemption 3 The CIA contends that its Glomar response was also proper under FOIA Exemption 3 because the information sought to be withheld is barred from disclosure pursuant to the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3001 - 3234. The Court finds this argument meritorious…”
Shapiro v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 37 F. Supp. 3d 7 (D.D.C. 2014). “The statute relevant to this discussion is the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3001 et seq., as amended by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Pub.”
Leopold v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2019). “Exemption 3 The CIA contends that its Glomar response was also proper under FOIA Exemption 3 because the information sought to be withheld is barred from disclosure pursuant to the National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3001–3234. The Court finds this argument meritorious…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.