50 U.S.C. § 454
Repealed. Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1303(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1669
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1971–1972 · leading case: United States v. Neptune
United States v. Neptune, 337 F. Supp. 1028 (D. Conn. 1972). “, because the place where he resides and where he was arrested is not in the United States and this Court is without jurisdiction; furthermore, he is not now and never has been a citizen or a national of the United States and hence is not subject to the Military Selective…”
Michael Kettel Haggerty v. Selective Serv. Sys., Local Bd. No. 15, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 449 F.2d 795 (3rd Cir. 1971). “§§ 3010 , 3012 (1964); 50 U.S.C. § 454 (a) (Supp. VI, 1970) , the procedure followed in this case was not “blatantly lawless”.”
United States v. Stephen James Harris, 453 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1972). “We cannot believe that Congress in enacting 50 U.S.C. § 454 (c) (3), or the Selective Service System in adopting 32 C.”
Haggerty v. Selective Serv. Sys., Local Bd. No. 15, 325 F. Supp. 69 (W.D. Pa. 1971). “Plaintiff contends that the promulgation of Subpart 2-43, the Vocational Waivers provision, is unauthorized by either 50 U.S.C. § 454 (a) or Executive Order 11098 since neither the Statute nor the Executive Order vest the Surgeon General with authority to waive a disqualifying…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.