50 U.S.C. § 501
Establishment of long-range proving ground for guided missiles and other weapons; jurisdiction of Secretary of the Air Force; use by all Services
The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized to establish a joint long-range proving ground for guided missiles and other weapons by the construction, installation, or equipment of temporary or permanent public works, including buildings, facilities, appurtenances, and utilities, within or without the continental limits of the United States, for scientific study, testing, and training purposes by the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1942–2025 · leading case: In Re Adoption of CF, 2005 WY 118 (Wyo. 2005).
In Re Adoption of CF, 2005 WY 118 (Wyo. 2005). “, 50 U.S.C. § 501 et seq.[?] VIII. Do the cumulative errors committed by the district court necessitate reversal of the final decree of adoption issued in this case[?] The Department of Family Services (DFS) presents the following issues: I.”
Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. Gibson, 27 Vet. App. 21 (Vet. App. 2014). “561, 575 (1943) (noting that Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 501 et seq., was "always to be liberally construed to protect those who have been obliged to drop their own affairs to take up the burdens of the nation"); Feres v.”
In Re Marriage of Lontos, 89 Cal. App. 3d 61 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979). “( 50 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq.) Neither an affidavit (declaration) was filed showing Mr.”
Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. P'ship, 676 A.2d 369 (Conn. 1996). ““See Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 501 et seq. (1990).” Fruin v.”
In Re the Marriage of Thompson, 832 P.2d 349 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “David contends the trial court (1) never obtained in personam jurisdiction over him sufficient to support a child support judgment, (2) failed to give him the required due process notice of the hearing, and (3) violated the provisions of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief…”
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Weinberg, 287 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (C.D. Cal. 2003). “Defendant is not an infant, incompetent, serving in the military of the United States or subject to the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. §§ 501 et seq. C. The Prior Commission Order On February 8, 1994, the Commission issued an Order (“CFTC Order”)…”
Snarski v. Krincek, 538 A.2d 1348 (Pa. 1988). “In the body of appellant’s brief to this Court, appellant appears to argue that since under the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. § 501 , appellant was allegedly entitled to a stay of these proceedings at the outset to enable him to return from military service…”
Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. P'ship, 662 A.2d 129 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). “” See Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C. § 501 et seq. (1990). The plaintiff claims that the defendants (1) placed a limitation on their obligation to abide by warranties and failed to disclose adequately these limitations in contravention of General…”
Rogers v. People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 697 N.E.2d 1193 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “Furthermore, he argues for the very first time, in a footnote to this claim, that Susan failed to file an affidavit that Victor was not on active military duty (although he now claims he was) pursuant to the provisions of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 (the…”
Rich v. Ervin, 194 P.2d 809 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948). “1178, 50 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq.]. The evidence shows that in 1909, plaintiff and Mae Ervin lived together as man and wife.”
Stevens v. Stevens, 199 P.2d 314 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948). “), which authorizes the court to set aside the provisions of the interlocutory decree, made prior to defendant’s entry into the armed forces, in an action in which he entered an appearance and waived notice of trial.”
In re H.R.B., 43 P.3d 887 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). “50 U.S.C. § 501 et seq. (1994). Although allegedly providing H.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.