U.S. Code » Title 6 » Chapter CHAPTER 3— SECURITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EVERY PORT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— SECURITY OF THE INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CHAIN › Part Part B— Customs–Trade Partnership Against Terrorism

6 U.S.C. § 4

REPORT ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CTPAT.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 6 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)In General.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 1, 2024], the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report assessing the effectiveness of CTPAT.“(b)Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:“(1) An analysis of—“(A) security incidents in the cargo supply chain during the 5-year period preceding submission of the report that involved criminal activity, including drug trafficking, human smuggling, commercial fraud, or terrorist activity; and“(B) whether those incidents involved participants in CTPAT or entities not participating in CTPAT.“(2) An analysis of causes for the suspension or removal of entities from participating in CTPAT as a result of security incidents during that 5-year period.“(3) An analysis of the number of active CTPAT participants involved in one or more security incidents while maintaining their status as participants.“(4) Recommendations to the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for improvements to CTPAT to improve prevention of security incidents in the cargo supply chain involving participants in CTPAT.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1928–1955 · leading case: United States v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 25 F.2d 500 (D. Maryland 1928).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 25 F.2d 500 (D. Maryland 1928). “This is emphasized by section 1 of the same act (6 USCA § 4), which provides for notice to the surety of the principal’s delinquency, as follows: “Whenever any deficiency shall be discovered in the accounts of any official of the United States, or of any officer disbursing or…”
United States v. Geise, 56 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1932). “On January 12, 1920, the Director of Pinanee, War Department, wrote the surety to give it notice in compliance with the requirements of chapter 787, Act of Congress, August 8, 1888 (section 1 [6 USCA § 4]), that a board of officers.had found a shortage in the accounts of the…”
United States v. Taylor, 132 F. Supp. 886 (E.D.N.Y 1955). “Payment was then duly demanded from the defendant Taylor, and notification sent to the Royal Indemnity Company pursuant to the provisions of the Act of August 8, 1888, Title 6 U.S.C.A. § 4 . In this notice, by form of letter from the plaintiff to the Royal Indemnity Company,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.