7 U.S.C. § 1281
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 137
cases, 1939–2016 · leading case: Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947).
Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947). “203 ; 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281 et seq. The United States filed this suit against petitioner to recover money "penalties" to which § 348 [1] of the Act makes non-cooperating farmers "subject" who market cotton from their farms in excess of their quota.”
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). “31 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 1281 et seq. 3 Because of the conclusion reached as to the merits, we need not consider the question whether these appellants would be proper if our decision were otherwise.”
United States v. Five Gambling Devices, 346 U.S. 441 (1953). “31 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 1281 et seq., Mulford v. Smith, 307 U.”
United States v. L. Robert Frame, Sr. & Vintage Sales Stables, Inc., 885 F.2d 1119 (3rd Cir. 1989). “When the Beef Research and Information Act was revised and strengthened in 1985 to its present form, this beef promotion program was incorporated into the larger Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281 et seq. (Supp. III. 1985), which aimed to protect the farm and livestock…”
Shore v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, 173 F.2d 678 (3rd Cir. 1949). “The case involved enforcement of the marketing provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., against a farmer who produced 239 bushels of wheat above his quota.”
Bryant v. Peckinpaugh, 400 S.E.2d 201 (Va. 1991). “7 U.S.C. § 1281 . The Agricultural Adjustment Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder, empower the Secretary of Agriculture to establish acreage allotments and impose marketing quotas upon the amount of tobacco which may be marketed in each state.”
Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp., 136 F.R.D. 672 (D. Kan. 1991). “, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281 et seq., the Food Security Act of 1985, Pub.”
Sec'y of Agric. v. Cent. Roig Refining Co., 338 U.S. 604 (1950). “31 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 1281 et seq., and sanctioned by this Court in Mulford v.”
Rigby Et Al. v. Flue-cured Tobacco Coop. Stabilization Corp., 794 S.E.2d 413 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). “7 USC § 1281 et seq. In brief, the USDA annually set the minimum price for flue-cured tobacco, and the payment for tobacco was funded through loans that the [Cooperative] received from the CCC.”
Gay Union Corp. v. Wallace, 112 F.2d 192 (D.C. Cir. 1940). “31 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq. The purpose in these laws, as is true of the sugar law, was to limit production and sale of agricultural products within the probable consumer demand, and to this end to allot to farms an equitable portion of the quota and to penalize sales in…”
Arlington Oil Mills, Inc. v. John A. Knebel, Acting Sec'y of Agric., Birdsong Corp., Intervenors Robert W. Moore, Movants-Appellants, 543 F.2d 1092 (5th Cir. 1976). “7 U.S.C. §§ 1281 et seq. The actual price support payable to a particular farmer in a given year depends upon determinations and calculations by the Secretary of a number of complex variables in accordance with formulas provided by this legislation.”
S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis David, 334 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1964). “31 ; 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq.), and regulations issued pursuant thereto under authority granted in Section 375 ( 7 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.