U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 35— AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1938 › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES › Part Part A— Definitions, Loans, Parity Payments, and Consumer Safeguards

7 U.S.C. § 1302

Repealed. Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, § 414, 63 Stat. 1057

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1942–2014 · leading case: Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947). · cites it 2× “1645, 75th Cong., 2d Sess., 1, 36 (1937); H.”
Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943). “43 , 7 U. S. C. § 1302 (a), the Commodity Credit Corporation is authorized “upon the recommendation of the Secretary and with the approval of the President, to make available loans on agricultural commodities .”
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). “…6 Federal Register 2695, 2699-2701. 5 §331, 7 U. S. C. § 1331 . 6 §335, 7 U. S. C. § 1335 . 7 §§ 302 (b) (h), 303, 7 U. S. C. §§ 1302 (b) (h), 1303; § 10 of the amendment of May 26, 1941, 7 U. S. C: (Súpp. I), § 1340 (10). 8 §335 (a), 7 U. S. C. § 1335 (a). 9 § 330, 7 R. S.…”
Direct Commc'ns Cedar Valley, LLC v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 753 F.3d 1015 (10th Cir. 2014). “(d) Does Section 706 of the Act, 1* 7 U.S.C. § 1302 , serve as an independent grant of authority to the FCC to impose the broadband requirement? In a related attack on the FCC’s broadband requirement, petitioners argue that Section 706 of the Act, 47 U.”
In Re Bowling Green Milling Co., 132 F.2d 279 (6th Cir. 1942). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 which directed commodity loans to be made available to producers eligible thereunder (Title 7 U.S.C. § 1302 (a) and (b), 7 U.S.C.A. § 1302 (a, b), the Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency of the United States subject to the…”
United States v. Fleming, 69 F. Supp. 252 (N.D. Iowa 1946). “Under the farm program adopted under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, § 302, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1302 , those farmers who participated in this program were eligible to secure corn loans from the Commodity Credit Corporation.”
Scroggin Farms Corp. v. McFadden, 165 F.2d 10 (8th Cir. 1948). “43 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 1302 , directs the Commodity Credit Corporation to make available to cotton producers loans on their cotton when the average market price of a specified grade of cotton falls below 52% of the parity price.”
Lavitt v. United States, 177 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1949). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1302 (h). To administer its loan program the government utilizes the services of local agricultural committees or associations which are to be organized as follows: “In carrying out the provisions of this section in the continental United States, the Secretary is…”
Scroggins Farms Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp., 60 F. Supp. 119 (E.D. Ark. 1945). “The cotton involved in this case was pledged to the defendant as security for mandatory, non-recourse loans, as ■ prescribed by Section 302 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1302 . The act provided for loans on cotton to the producers thereof only.”
Repub. Nat'l Bank v. Comm'r, 9 T.C. 1039 (Tax Ct. 1947). “43 , 7 U. S. C. § 1302 (c) . The obligations in the first instance were those of the cotton producers who received the loans and were the makers of the notes.”
John M. Parker Co. v. May, 128 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir. 1942). “302 (c) (h), 7 U.S. C.A. § 1302 (c) (h). The Corporation, pri- or to maturity of these loans, extended them to July 31, 1940.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.