7 U.S.C. § 1348

Payments in kind to equalize cost of cotton to domestic and foreign users; rules and regulations; termination date; persons eligible; amount; terms and conditions; raw cotton in inventory

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to maintain and expand domestic consumption of upland cotton produced in the United States and to prevent discrimination against the domestic users of such cotton, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commodity Credit Corporation, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, is authorized and directed for the period beginning with April 11, 1964 and ending July 31, 1966, to make payments through the issuance of payment-in-kind certificates to persons other than producers in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines will eliminate inequities due to differences in the cost of raw cotton between domestic and foreign users of such cotton, including such payments as may be necessary to make raw cotton in inventory on April 11, 1964 available for consumption at prices consistent with the purposes of this section: Provided, That for the period beginning August 1 of the marketing year for the first crop for which price support is made available under section 1444(b) of this title, and ending July 31, 1966, such payments shall be made in an amount which will make upland cotton produced in the United States available for domestic use at a price which is not in excess of the price at which such cotton is made available for export. The Secretary may extend the period for performance of obligations incurred in connection with payments made for the period ending July 31, 1966, or may make payments on raw cotton in inventory on July 31, 1966, at the rate in effect on such date. No payments shall be made hereunder with respect to 1966 crop cotton.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1939–1985 · leading case: Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rodgers v. United States, 332 U.S. 371 (1947). · cites it 2× “59 ; 7 U.S.C. § 1348 . The 1941 amendment required computation of the penalty on the following basis: "That notwithstanding the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended (hereinafter referred to as the Act) .”

Rodgers v. United States, 138 F.2d 992 (6th Cir. 1943). · cites it 2× “On account of these excess sales, appellant became liable for the sanctions under Section 348 of the Act 7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 , in the sum of $3,123.”

In Re J. Catton Farms, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. The First Nat'l Bank of Chicago, 779 F.2d 1242 (1st Cir. 1985). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1348 , 1444(c), 1445b-l(e); 16 U.”

Fraser v. United States, 145 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1944). · cites it 2× “Such penalties shall be remitted to the Secretary by the person liable for the penalty, except that if any other person is liable for the collection of the penalty, such other person shall remit the penalty.”

Perfect Photo, Inc. v. Grabb, 205 F. Supp. 569 (E.D. Pa. 1962). “The fact that the plaintiff suffered no money damage and the absence of proof that defendant actually made any unfair use of inside information, are not decisive.”

United States v. West Texas Cottonoil Co., 155 F.2d 463 (5th Cir. 1946). “348, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 . Defendant is a corporate subsidiary of Anderson-Clayton & Co.”

Rodgers v. United States, 158 F.2d 835 (6th Cir. 1947). “As established for the 1940-41 marketing year ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 ), they were at the rate of 30 per pound, for 1941-42, 70 per pound and for 1942- 43, 80 per pound.”

United States v. R. L. Dixon & Bro., Inc., 36 F. Supp. 147 (N.D. Tex. 1940). “348 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 . That in the absence of such identification, all of such cotton is deemed to be subject to the penalty, and that the total amount thereof is $8,760.”

Fulford v. Forman, 144 F. Supp. 536 (S.D. Tex. 1956). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 and § 1346. . 7 U.S.C.A.”

Troppy v. La Sara Farmers Gin Co., 28 F. Supp. 830 (S.D. Tex. 1939). “348, Part IV, of the Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1348 . *831 The gin companies tendered the amount of penalties into Court and, under an appropriate order, the money was paid into the registry of this court pending final determination of the case.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.