7 U.S.C. § 1351
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1964–1978 · leading case: W. A. McClung v. W. C. Thompson, W. C. Thompson v. W. A. McClung, 401 F.2d 253 (8th Cir. 1968).
W. A. McClung v. W. C. Thompson, W. C. Thompson v. W. A. McClung, 401 F.2d 253 (8th Cir. 1968). “The provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act relating to “Marketing Quotas — Rice,” 7 U.S.C. §§ 1351 through 1356, reveal with certainty that acreage allotments for rice shall be apportioned to farms.”
First Victoria Nat'l Bank v. United States, 443 F. Supp. 865 (S.D. Tex. 1978). “For the year 1973, farm marketing quotas pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 1351 , et seq., were in effect.”
Clubb v. Dekeyzer, 161 So. 2d 63 (La. 1964). “( 7 U.S.C. §§ 1351 (a)) Consequently, the “disorderly marketing” of such excessive supplies “burdens, and obstructs interstate and foreign commerce”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.