7 U.S.C. § 1353

CHANGES IN PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

“With regard to Federal grade standards developed and promulgated pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture shall:“(1) Take into account the impact of those standards on the ability of perishable commodity growers to reduce the use of pesticides.“(2) Provide for citizens outside of the perishable commodity industry fair and reasonable opportunity to formally petition a change in grade standards.“(3) Provide for a comment period after a formal petition to change grade standards has been made to enable all interested parties to submit information. The Secretary of Agriculture shall evaluate the information and consider it in the revision process.“(4) Provide interested parties with annual status reports during the period 1992 through 1994, updated upon request, on all pending grade standard changes the Department of Agriculture is considering.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1963–1980 · leading case: First Victoria Nat'l Bank, Indep. Under the Will of T. J. Babb, Deceased v. United States, 620 F.2d 1096 (1st Cir. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

First Victoria Nat'l Bank, Indep. Under the Will of T. J. Babb, Deceased v. United States, 620 F.2d 1096 (1st Cir. 1980). · cites it 9× “3 The national allotment is then apportioned among the rice-producing states, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1353 (a) (West 1973) (operation currently suspended, see n.”

Miguez v. Miguez, 453 S.W.2d 514 (Tex. App. 1970). · cites it 8× “This may vary from year to year, but cannot be less than the total acreage allotted in 1956’ [ 7 U.S.C. § 1353 (c) (6)]. The national acreage allotment is apportioned among states [ 7 U.”

Brown v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 343 (Ct. Cl. 1966). · cites it 2× “§ 1352 (1952)), for the apportionment of the national acreage allotment among the several rice-producing States ( 7 U.S.C. § 1353 (a) (1952)), and for the allocation of each State acreage allotment “to farms owned or operated by persons who have produced rice in any one of the…”

First Victoria Nat'l Bank v. United States, 443 F. Supp. 865 (S.D. Tex. 1978). · cites it 3× “Apportionment to individual producers in producer states is regulated by 7 U.S.C. § 1353 (b), which provides in part, “The State acreage allotment shall be apportioned to farms owned or operated by persons who have produced rice in the State in any one of the five years…”

In Re Adams, 357 F. Supp. 1184 (S.D. Tex. 1973). · cites it 2× “Finally, the Referee determined that the statute, 7 U.S.C. § 1353 (f), and the Department of Agriculture regulations, 7 C.”

Clubb v. Dekeyzer, 161 So. 2d 63 (La. 1964). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 1353 (a) this initial apportionment is to be made “among the several States in which rice is produced in proportion to the average number of acres of rice in each State” during the immediately preceding five-year period.”

Clubb v. DeKeyzer, 152 So. 2d 77 (La. Ct. App. 1963). “1 The present rice acreage allotment affects land within a “farm administrative area”, in which (unlike in a “producer administrative area”) the rice acreage allotments are made to “farms” (not to the persons who produce rice) on the basis of the previous rice production of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.