U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 35— AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1938 › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES › Part Part C— Administrative Provisions › Subpart subpart ii— adjustment of quotas and enforcement

7 U.S.C. § 1375

Regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Secretary shall provide by regulations for the identification, wherever necessary, of corn, wheat, cotton, rice, or peanuts so as to afford aid in discovering and identifying such amounts of the commodities as are subject to and such amounts thereof as are not subject to marketing restrictions in effect under this subchapter.(b) The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary for the enforcement of this subchapter.(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, § 375, 52 Stat. 66; Apr. 3, 1941, ch. 39, § 9, 55 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, § 611(k), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1523.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–357, § 611(k)(1), substituted “or peanuts” for “peanuts, or tobacco”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–357, § 611(k)(2), which directed amendment of this section by striking out subsec. (c), could not be executed because this section does not contain a subsec. (c).

1941—Subsec. (a). Act Apr. 3, 1941, inserted “peanuts,” after “rice,”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–357 applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date note under section 518 of this title.

Savings Provision

Amendment by sections 611 to 614 of Pub. L. 108–357 not to affect the liability of any person under any provision of law so amended with respect to the 2004 or an earlier crop of tobacco, see section 614 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 515 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1943–1994 · leading case: S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis David, 334 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1964).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis David, 334 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1964). · cites it 2× “), and regulations issued pursuant thereto under authority granted in Section 375 ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 ) and 7 C.F.R. 730.1021(3), as amended.”
Rodgers v. United States, 138 F.2d 992 (6th Cir. 1943). “66 , 7 U.S. C.A. § 1375, requires the Secretary of Agriculture to provide by regulation for the identification of cotton so as to afford aid in discovering and identifying such cotton as is subject to, or excluded from, the marketing restrictions of the Act.”
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David, 350 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. 1965). · cites it 2× “” 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 (b); see Morrow v. Clayton, supra at 45, of 326 F.”
Luke v. Review Comm., 155 F. Supp. 719 (W.D. La. 1957). · cites it 2× “825, prohibiting the transfer or assignment of cotton acreage allotments is arbitrary and capricious, and exceeds the authority and powers vested in the Secretary under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 (b). *722 3. That if Section 722.”
United States v. Morelock, 124 F. Supp. 932 (D. Maryland 1954). · cites it 3× “The Regulations Pursuant to 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 , the Secretary issued and published in the Federal Register, 19 F.”
James Weir v. United States, 310 F.2d 149 (8th Cir. 1962). “30 issued pursuant to 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 provides for the organization and operation of the review board.”
Morrow v. Clayton, 326 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1963). · cites it 3× “7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 (b). It also provides in 7 U.”
Roy L. Fowler, Dean Burroughs & Celestine Schneider, as Members of the Mktg. Quota Review Comm. of Douglas Cnty., Kansas v. John B. Gage, 301 F.2d 775 (10th Cir. 1962). “Authority for them is claimed under 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 (b). Regulation 728.919 lays down the qualifications for new farm allotments as follows: (1) The application must be filed on or before the closing date.”
Thomas v. Cnty. Off. Comm. of Cameron Cnty., 327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Tex. 1971). “27 (1970) as authorized by 7 U.S.C. § 1375 (1938) as amended (1941).”
United States v. Shafer, 132 F. Supp. 659 (D. Maryland 1955). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 . They also attack for the same reason the proclamation of the result of the referendum, signed by Earl Butz, as Acting Secretary, 19 F.”
United States v. Lillard, 143 F. Supp. 113 (W.D. Mo. 1956). “Pursuant to Regulations issued by the Secretary of Agriculture under the authority vested in him by 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 , the proper procedure for a review of the farm marketing quota is set forth in 7 C.”
United States v. Bonderer, 139 F. Supp. 391 (W.D. Mo. 1956). “” Also, under Regulations issued by the Secretary of Agriculture under authority of 7 U.S.C.A. § 1375 , (7 C.F.R. 728. 465, 19 F.”
Show all 29 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.