U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 26— AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— COMMODITY BENEFITS

7 U.S.C. § 18

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
“For purposes of this Act:“(1)Commodities.—The term ‘commodities’ means agricultural commodities and their products that are donated by the Secretary for use by recipient agencies.“(2)End product.—The term ‘end product’ means a food product that contains processed commodities.“(3) The term ‘recipient agency’ means—“(A) a school, school food service authority, or other agency authorized under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act [42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.] or the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) to operate breakfast programs, lunch programs, child care food programs, summer food service programs, or similar programs and to receive donations of agricultural commodities and their products acquired by the Secretary through price support, surplus removal, or direct purchase;“(B) a nutrition program for the elderly authorized under title III of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3021 et seq.) to receive donations of agricultural commodities and their products acquired by the Secretary through price support, surplus removal, or direct purchase;“(C) an agency or organization distributing commodities under the commodity supplemental food program established in section 4 of the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973 [Pub. L. 93–86] (7 U.S.C. 612c note);“(D) any charitable institution, summer camp, or assistance agency for the food distribution program on Indian reservations authorized under section 4 of the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973 (7 U.S.C. 612c note) to receive donations of agricultural commodities and their products acquired by the Secretary through price support, surplus removal, or direct purchase; or“(E) an agency or organization distributing commodities under a program established in section 202 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 612c note) [7 U.S.C. 7502].“(4) The term ‘State distribution agency’ means a State agency responsible for the intrastate distribution of donated commodities.“(5) The term ‘Secretary’ means Secretary of Agriculture, unless the context specifies otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 136 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1932–2022 · leading case: Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986). · cites it 8× “Thus, § 14 of the CEA, 7 U. S. C. § 18 (1976 ed.), [1] provides that any person injured by such violations may apply to the Commission for an order directing the offender to pay reparations to the complainant and may enforce that order in federal district court.”
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran, 456 U.S. 353 (1982). · cites it 6× “1393 -1395 (adding § 14 of the CEA, codified as subsequently amended, 7 U. S. C. § 18 (1976 ed. and Supp. IV)).”
Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011). · cites it 2× “§160 ; 7 U. S. C. §18 ; 49 U. S. C. §10704 ; 42 U.”
Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680 (1983). · cites it 4× “); Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U. S. C. § 18 (f); Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.”
Loginovskaya v. Batratchenko, 764 F.3d 266 (2d Cir. 2014). · cites it 5× “2006) (“Congress enacted CEA § 22 but enumerated the only circumstances under which a civil litigant could assert a private right of action for a violation of the CEA or CFTA regulations.”
Rosenthal & Co. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 614 F.2d 1121 (7th Cir. 1980). · cites it 13× “The procedure in reparation cases before the CFTC is established in 7 U.S.C. § 18 . CFTC rules promulgated under that section are found in 17 C.”
Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 133 S. Ct. 1166 (2013). · cites it 2× “, 7 U. S. C. §18 (d)(1) (“The petitioner shall not be liable for costs in the district court”).”
Calvin Lee Word v. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 924 F.3d 1363 (11th Cir. 2019). · cites it 11× “14] (the " Motion ") because Word failed to post the required appeal bond under 7 U.S.C. § 18 (e). We grant their Motion and dismiss Word's petition for want of jurisdiction.”
Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985). · cites it 2× “1394 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. §§ 18 (d) and (e). 5. Packers and Stockyard Act of 1921, 42 Stat.”
Burton Schultz v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Incomco, Inc. & Philip M. Smith, 716 F.2d 136 (2d Cir. 1983). · cites it 5× “On October 5, 1979, he filed a claim with the Commission against Smith and Incomco for reparation under section 14 of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 18 (1976 & Supp. V 1981), claiming that the unauthorized sale violated section 4b of the Act, 7 U.”
Paul W. Kessenich v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Rosenthal & Co. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Paul W. Kessenich, Intervenor, 684 F.2d 88 (D.C. Cir. 1982). · cites it 6× “BACKGROUND Under section 14 of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 18 (1976), a person aggrieved in certain transactions dealing with commodity trading is given an exclusive remedy for his injury.”
Rothberg v. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., 445 F. Supp. 1336 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). · cites it 7× “On November 3, 1976, plaintiff then applied to the CFTC for a reparation hearing pursuant to Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange Act of 1974, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 18 (1976). On November 19, 1976, plaintiff brought the present action to stay arbitration pursuant to Rule 65 Fed.”
Show all 136 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.