7 U.S.C. § 22

Research and information programs; reports to Congress

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Commission shall establish and maintain, as part of its ongoing operations, research and information programs to (1) determine the feasibility of trading by computer, and the expanded use of modern information system technology, electronic data processing, and modern communication systems by commodity exchanges, boards of trade, and by the Commission itself for purposes of improving, strengthening, facilitating, or regulating futures trading operations; (2) assist in the development of educational and other informational materials regarding futures trading for dissemination and use among producers, market users, and the general public; and (3) carry out the general purposes of this chapter.(b) The Commission shall include in its annual reports to Congress plans and findings with respect to implementing this section.(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, § 18, as added Pub. L. 93–463, title IV, § 416, Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1415.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

For effective date of section, see section 418 of Pub. L. 93–463, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2023 · leading case: Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon), 230 B.R. 546 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon), 230 B.R. 546 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1999). “This Court has jurisdiction over the CEA and fraudulent conveyance claims asserted herein pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 22 (c), 28 U.S.C. § 1331 , and 11 U.”

In Re Arbitration Between Johns & Taramita, Inc., 132 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (S.D. Fla. 2001). “7 The *1026 Court compared the relevant provision, 7 U.S.C. § 22 , with other sections of the Commodity Exchange Act.”

Starshinova v. Batratchenko, 931 F. Supp. 2d 478 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). “2006) (emphasis added); see also 7 U.S.C. § 22 (b)(5) (explaining that private rights of action enumerated in Section 22(b) “shall be the exclusive remedy .”

Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. Brady, 740 F. Supp. 1007 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “See 7 U.S.C. § 22 (a)(2) (1988); 20 U.S.C.A. § 3192 (a)(3) (West 1990); 22 U.”

New Mexico State Inv. Council v. Bank of Am. Corp. (D.N.M. 2023). “Defendants further argue that Plaintiffs made no concrete allegations against Barclays Bank plc, Deutsche Bank AG, and Goldman Sachs International, id. at 62 n.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.