7 U.S.C. § 2303
Prohibited practices
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2024 · leading case: Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc., 604 F.3d 272 (6th Cir. 2010).
Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc., 604 F.3d 272 (6th Cir. 2010). “Terry brought suit under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967 (“AFPA”), 7 U.S.C. § 2303 , alleging unlawful interference and discrimination based on his membership in the growers’ association; and the Packers and Stockyards Act (“PSA”), 7 U.”
Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agric. Mktg. & Bargaining Bd., 467 U.S. 461 (1984). “7 U. S. C. §2303 . Specifically, § 2303(a) forbids “handlers”— *465 defined to include both processors and producers’ associations 3 — to “coerce any producer in the exercise of his right to join and belong to or to refrain from joining or belonging to an association of…”
United Wild Rice, Inc. v. Nelson, 313 N.W.2d 628 (Minn. 1982). “44 (1980), or unfair trade practices, 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (1976). The district court held in the affirmative.”
Larry Leonhardt, Dan Laursen, & Rick Rodriquez, Rodriquez Farms, Inc. v. W. Sugar Co., a Corp., 160 F.3d 631 (10th Cir. 1998). “” 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (e). The complaint here alleged that Western Sugar violated the prohibition contained in § 2303(e) by “conducting] cossette tests on the 1985-1995 crops contrary to the standards established by the U.”
Nat'l Broiler Mktg. Ass'n v. United States, 436 U.S. 816 (1978). “" 7 U. S. C. § 2303 (b) (1976 ed.) (emphasis added).”
Massachusetts Med. Soc'y v. Michael S. Dukakis, 815 F.2d 790 (1st Cir. 1987). “an association of producers’ ” (quoting 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (a))); Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Association v.”
Ripplemeyer v. Nat'l Grape Co-Op. Ass'n, Inc., 807 F. Supp. 1439 (W.D. Ark. 1992). “§§ 1-2 ; 2) violations of the Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967, 7 U.S.C. § 2303 ; 3) violations of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.”
Baldree v. Cargill, Inc., 758 F. Supp. 704 (M.D. Fla. 1990). “§ 192 (b); and (iii) coercion, intimidation and discrimination against agricultural producers based on their exercise of their legal rights to affiliate with an association of producers, in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2303 . (b) Cargill terminated Gaskins to hamper and prevent the…”
Newark Gardens, Inc. v. Michigan Potato Indus. Comm'n, 847 F.2d 1201 (6th Cir. 1988). “*1204 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (a), (c) (emphasis added).”
Butz v. Lawson Milk Co., Div. Consol. Foods Corp., 386 F. Supp. 227 (N.D. Ohio 1974). “In Count I, the Secretary alleges that Lawson’s has interfered with the right of an individual producer of milk, John Weir, to join an association of producers in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2303 , by terminating its contract with Weir for the purchase of his milk solely because…”
Kinnett Dairies, Inc. v. Dairymen, Inc., 512 F. Supp. 608 (M.D. Ga. 1981). “§§ 13 and 14 (1973)), Section 4 of the Agricultural Fair Practices Act of 1967 ( 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (1973)), and breach of contract.”
Bybee Farms, LLC v. Snake River Sugar Co., 563 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (E.D. Wash. 2008). “an association of producers,” 7 U.S.C. § 2303 (a), or to knowingly “coerce or intimidate any producer to .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.