7 U.S.C. § 499q
Separability
If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1976–1998 · leading case: Leonard O'day, Dba Leonard O'Day Co. v. George Arakelian Farms, Inc., a California Corp., United States of Am., Intervenor, 536 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1976).
Leonard O'day, Dba Leonard O'Day Co. v. George Arakelian Farms, Inc., a California Corp., United States of Am., Intervenor, 536 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1976). “ufficient to secure payment of the reparation award, interest, and costs on appeal, including reasonable attorneys’ fees; 9 since the remaining question (the appropriate amount of such a bond) is peculiarly within judicial rather than legislative expertise; and since Con *862…”
Adsani v. Miller, 139 F.3d 67 (2d Cir. 1998). “Nonetheless, due to a sev-erability clause in 7 U.S.C. § 499q, the statutory provision requiring a bond was sustained to the extent that it required a bond sufficient to secure payment of the damages award, interest, and costs on appeal, including attorney’s fees.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 499q(c) — 1 case
Leonard O'day, Dba Leonard O'Day Co. v. George Arakelian Farms, Inc., a California Corp., United States of Am., Intervenor, 536 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1976). “ufficient to secure payment of the reparation award, interest, and costs on appeal, including reasonable attorneys’ fees; 9 since the remaining question (the appropriate amount of such a bond) is peculiarly within judicial rather than legislative expertise; and since Con *862…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.