7 U.S.C. § 5940
Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, § 7605(b), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4829; Pub. L. 116–159, div. A, § 122, Oct. 1, 2020, 134 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 116–260, div. A, title VII, § 782, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 1230.
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Lundy v. Commonwealth, 511 S.W.3d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
Lundy v. Commonwealth, 511 S.W.3d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017). “7 U.S.C. § 5940 (a) provides: Notwithstanding the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.”
Menominee Indian Tribe v. Drug Enf't Admin., 190 F. Supp. 3d 843 (E.D. Wis. 2016). “The Tribe seeks a judgment declaring that its cultivation of industrial hemp for agricultural or academic research purposes in connection with the College of Menominee Nation is lawful under a 2014 federal law, 7 U.S.C. § 5940 , which created an exemption to the Controlled…”
Ak Futures LLC v. Boyd Street Distro, LLC, 35 F.4th 682 (9th Cir. 2022). “The term “industrial hemp” does appear in a separate section modifying previously enacted authorization for research into the plant. § 7605, 132 Stat.”
Hemp Indus. Ass'n v. DEA, 36 F.4th 278 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “See 7 U.S.C. § 5940 . 6 directed the USDA Secretary to administer and implement hemp production plans, 4 see id.”
United States v. Mallory, 372 F. Supp. 3d 377 (2019). “" 7 U.S.C. § 5940 . 1 Mr. Mallory, using the business name CAMO HEMP WV LLC, applied for and received a Research and Marketing Cultivation of Industrial Hemp License from the West Virginia Department of Agriculture (WVDA) to grow the plants.”
United States v. Mallory (S.D.W. Va 2019). “113-79, title VII, § 7606 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 5940 (2014) (the “2014 Farm Bill”)).”
Free Spirit Organics, NAC v. San Joaquin Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors (E.D. Cal. 2022). “” 7 U.S.C. § 5940 (b)(1). The California Industrial Hemp Farming Act (Hemp Act) 26 | permits the cultivation of hemp as “regulated by the Department of Food and Agriculture.”
Hemp Indus. Ass'n v. Usdea (9th Cir. 2018). “3 Petitioners also claim the Final Rule conflicts with a portion of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (now codified at 7 U.S.C. § 5940 ) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016, Pub.”
Sandstone Springs, LLC v. Virag Distrib., LLC (W.D.N.Y. 2022). “3% of its dry weight, 7 U.S.C. § 5940 (a)(2) (definition of industrial hemp).”
Texas Dep't of State Health Servs. John Hellerstedt, in His Off. Capacity as Comm'r of the Texas Dshs v. Crown Distrib. LLC Am. Juice Co., LLC Custom Botanical Dispensary, LLC 1937 Apothecary, Llc (Tex. 2022). “649, 912 (2014) (current version at 7 U.S.C. § 5940 ); see Patton, supra note 3, at 20 n.”
Duke's Investments LLC v. Char (D. Haw. 2022). “at ¶ 14 (quoting 7 U.S.C. § 5940 (a)(2)).] Plaintiff alleges the Federal Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (“2018 Farm Act”) amended the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) in two ways.”
Zini v. City of Jerseyville (S.D. Ill. 2024). “” 7 U.S.C. § 5940 (a)(2). In 2018, the Agriculture Improvements Act of 2018 (“2018 Farm Act”) repealed and replaced the 2014 Farm Act, legalizing the “possession and cultivation of hemp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.