7 U.S.C. § 7254

Effect on fluid milk standards in State of California

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this Act or any other provision of law shall be construed to preempt, prohibit, or otherwise limit the authority of the State of California, directly or indirectly, to establish or continue to effect any law, regulation, or requirement regarding—(1) the percentage of milk solids or solids not fat in fluid milk products sold at retail or marketed in the State of California; or(2) the labeling of such fluid milk products with regard to milk solids or solids not fat.(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 144, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 917.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2003 · leading case: Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons, 539 U.S. 59 (2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hillside Dairy Inc. v. Lyons, 539 U.S. 59 (2003). · cites it 6× “917 , 7 U. S. C. § 7254 , exempts California's milk pricing and pooling regulations from scrutiny under the Commerce Clause; and (2) whether the individual petitioners' claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause is foreclosed because those regulations do not discriminate…”

Shamrock Farms Co. v. Veneman, 146 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1998). “7 U.S.C. § 7254 (emphasis added). California’s milk standards and its pricing and pooling laws constitute an integrally related scheme.”

Ponderosa Dairy v. Lyons, 259 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2001). “7 U.S.C. § 7254 . The unanimous panel found the “any other provision of law” language persuasive and indicative of Congress’ intent to create “a blanket exclusion” for California’s composition requirements.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.