7 U.S.C. § 75a

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–354, title II, § 293(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3237

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: HNV Cent. River Front Corp. v. United States, 25 Cl. Ct. 606 (Ct. Cl. 1992).
HNV Cent. River Front Corp. v. United States, 25 Cl. Ct. 606 (Ct. Cl. 1992). · cites it 2× “1 at 2; 7 U.S.C. §§ 75a, 77(b), 79(e)(1). While FGIS inspections were not specified by contract, inspection of the grain on load-in and load-out was contractually required for the purpose of settlement on load-out of differences in grain quality and quantity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.