8 U.S.C. § 106
To the extent that may be appropriate to facilitate the determination of the amount of any reductions under sections 201(b)(2), 301(b)(3), and 401(b)(2), the Secretary shall consult with the heads of other agencies providing assistance to eligible participants in order to secure information concerning the disbursement of funds for educational purposes under programs administered by them and provide, wherever feasible, for coordination among those programs and the programs under titles II through IV of this Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1927–1999 · leading case: Linklater v. Perkins
Linklater v. Perkins (1934)
“598 ), section 1 (8 USCA § 106) of which states that: “It shall be the duty of the Bureau of Immigration [and Naturalization] to provide, for use at the various immigration stations throughout the United States, books of record, wherein the commissioners of immigration shall…”
United States ex rel. Dombrowski v. Karnuth (1937)
“Petitioner never registered at the Port of Entry on any entrance into the United States.”
Ex Parte Kurth (1939)
“They have declared the conditions upon which a person shall enter the United States.”
Davidowitz v. Hines (1939)
“596 , 8 U.S.C.A. § 106 , and Act of February 5, 1917, c.”
In re Cassovel (1927)
“” 8 USCA § 106. One purpose of tbe requirement of this certificate of arrival to accompany tbe petition for naturalization may be assumed to be a check upon tbe averment of residence.”
Berlanga v. Reno (1999)
“17 *761 This unambiguous statement is a clear expression of Congressional intent to deprive aliens subject to 8 U.S.C. § 106 (a)(10), as amended by § 440(a), of any right to involve the courts in habeas review of deportation or removal orders.”
Palmer v. United States ex rel. Grigaliunas (1933)
“Appellee, who is a native of Lithuania, entered the United States from Canada on November 7,1928, without inspection or paying a head tax or registering, as provided for by the Immigration Aet (8 USCA §§ 106, 132, 151 et seq.). He was thereafter seized by the immigration…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.