8 U.S.C. § 11
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1995–2015 · leading case: Ahmed v. Holder, 624 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2010).
Ahmed v. Holder, 624 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2010). “8U.S.C. § 11 S2(a)(6)(C)(i). 4 . Section 212(a)(7)(A)(i) of the INA provides, in relevant part: [Any immigrant at the time of application for admission] who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa .”
Khan v. Holder, 727 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2013). “See 8 U.S.C. § 11 '58 note (Effective Date of 2005 Amendment); Tay-Chan v.”
Mohan Kutty v. United States Dep't of Labor, 764 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2014). “Finally, the ALJ barred Kutty from employing aliens for two years pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 11 S2(n) (2) (C) (ii). On May 31, 2005, the ARB affirmed the ALJ’s decision.”
Paek v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 793 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir. 2015). “, INA § 216(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 11 .86a(b)(2) (“Any alien whose permanent resident status is terminated under paragraph (1) may request a review of such determination in a proceeding to remove the alien.”
Tee, 20 I. & N. Dec. 949 (BIA 1995). “99503 BY: Dunne, Acting Chairman; Vacca and Heilman, Board Members; Holmes, Alternate Board Member The respondent has appealed from the March 14, 1991, decision of an immigration judge finding her deportable as charged and denying her joint petition to remove the conditional…”
Pers. Restraint Petition of Juan Pedro Ramos (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “" 8 U.S.C. § 110 1. But several federal circuits offer guidance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.