8 U.S.C. § 1186
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: AFL-CIO v. Brock
AFL-CIO v. Brock (1987)
“” 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (a)(1)(B). Historically, the Secretary fulfilled this mandate by establishing an “adverse effect wage rate” (“AEWR”) in areas where wages were depressed by the importation of aliens.”
Elias Eid v. John Thompson (2014)
“§ 1186a(b)(l)(A)(i); 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (d)(l)(A)(i)(III))); Ferrante v.”
Sung Hee Damon Sang Woo Lee Seung Woo Lee v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (2004)
“§ 1186a(a), (d) (1996), recodi-fied as amended at INA § 216(d)(2)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (a)(d)(2)(A) (2003). Pursuant to the statutory requirements, Sung Hee and Scott Damon were required to file a joint petition for removal of the conditional status within 90 days prior to the…”
Carpio v. Holder (2010)
“3d at 1119 , until “the second anniversary of the alien’s obtaining the status of lawful admission for permanent residence[,]” 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (d)(2); and (2) the provision of § 1255(d) that allows adjustments of status “on a conditional basis .”
Choin v. Mukasey (2008)
“8 U.S.C. § 1186 (c)(4)(B). Choin’s Eligibility Choin complied with the statutory framework described above.”
Yadvender Singh v. U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (2006)
“Because Singh married his second wife and had his two children after May 1990 — by which time Singh’s conditional residency had been terminated and deportation proceedings had begun — the government argues that the BIA correctly found that Singh’s family situation could not be…”
Amparo de Ocasio v. Ashcroft (2004)
“See 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (a)(1). As part of the process for adjusting the petitioner’s status from conditional to full, permanent status, the petitioner and Ocasio appeared for an interview before an Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) officer in May 1997.”
Lockhart v. Napolitano (2009)
“According to 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (a), (b)(1), [an] alien spouse who receives permanent resident status as an immediate relative before the second anniversary of her qualifying marriage does so on a conditional basis, and if the Attorney General determines that prior to the second…”
Hammad v. Holder (2010)
“” See 8 U.S.C. § 1186 (c)(4). Ill Hammad raises several arguments on appeal.”
Northwest Forest Workers Ass'n v. Lyng (1988)
“8 U.S.C. § 1186 . Under the H-2A program an agricultural employer may petition the Secretary of Labor for a certification that there are insufficient domestic workers available and willing to perform and that the employment of alien labor will not adversely affect the wages and…”
Keli v. Rice (2008)
“§ 1429 (2000) (the “INA”), as amended by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1186 (b), 1288, 1254a, 1304, 1324c, 1252b, 29 U.”
The Sweet Life v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor (1989)
“8 U.S.C. § 1186 ( Pub.L. 99-603, Title III, § 301(c), Nov.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.