8 U.S.C. § 1287

Alien crewmen brought into the United States with intent to evade immigration laws; penalties

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, including the owner, agent, consignee, master, or commanding officer of any vessel or aircraft arriving in the United States from any place outside thereof, who shall knowingly sign on the vessel’s articles, or bring to the United States as one of the crew of such vessel or aircraft, any alien, with intent to permit or assist such alien to enter or land in the United States in violation of law, or who shall falsely and knowingly represent to a consular officer at the time of application for visa, or to the immigration officer at the port of arrival in the United States, that such alien is a bona fide member of the crew employed in any capacity regularly required for normal operation and services aboard such vessel or aircraft, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding $10,000 for each such violation, for which sum such vessel or aircraft shall be liable and may be seized and proceeded against by way of libel in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the offense.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1975–2001 · leading case: United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-Ulibarry

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-Ulibarry (2000) ca9 “We noted in Pena-Cabanillas that 8 U.S.C. §§ 1287 , 1306, 1324, 1325 and 1328 each used terms such as "knowingly,” "wilfully,” "unlawful intent” and "purpose,” which explicitly indicated specific intent was required, while 8 U.”

United States v. Guillermo Carlos-Colmenares (2001) ca7 “See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1287 , 1306(a), 1324(a)(1)(A), 1324c(a), 1325(a), 1327; see Pena-Cabanillas v.”

Slatky, John v. Amoco Oil Company, Service Station Dealers of America, Inc., Amicus Curiae (1987) ca3 “§ 1101 (b)(1)(D), for a “bona fide member of the crew” of a vessel, 8 U.S.C. § 1287 , or for employees of a “bona fide United States incorporated nonprofit organization,” 8 U.”

United States v. Rolf Wilhelm Otto Anton (1982) ca7 “. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(1), an alien who “at the time of entry was within one or more of the classes of aliens excludable by the law existing at the time of such entry” can be deported.”

United States v. Ramon Gonzalez-Chavez (1997) ca8 “4 (referring to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1287 , 1306, 1324, 1325, 1327, and 1328).”

Atlas Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, United States Department Oflabor (1975) ca5 “8 U.S.C. § 1287 (1970). Intent to evade immigration laws or bring alien crewmen into United States with intent to evade immigration laws.”

Manarolakis v. Coomey (1976) mad “§ 1286 ) or bring crewmen to the United States with intent to evade immigration laws ( 8 U.S.C. § 1287 ).”

United States v. R. Gonzalez-Chavez (1997) ca8 “4 (referring to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1287 , 1306, 1324, 1325, 1327, and 1328).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.