8 U.S.C. § 1382

Acceptance and administration of gifts for immigration integration grants program

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is authorized in fiscal year 2017, and in each fiscal year thereafter, to solicit, accept, administer, and utilize gifts, including donations of property, for the purpose of providing an immigrant integration grants program and related activities to promote citizenship and immigrant integration: Provided, That all sums received under this subsection shall be deposited in a separate account in the general fund of the Treasury to be known as the “Citizenship Gift and Bequest Account”: Provided further, That all funds deposited into the Citizenship Gift and Bequest Account shall remain available until expended, and shall be available in addition to any funds appropriated or otherwise made available for an immigrant integration grants program or other activities to promote citizenship and immigrant integration.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2024 · leading case: Adelfo v. MacEren v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, California

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Adelfo v. MacEren v. District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, California (1975) ca9 “Although it could, under different circumstances, be argued that a labor certification pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1382 (a) (14) is not required for one who qualifies as a member of the professions because he practices a profession and does not perform either “skilled or unskilled…”

(PC) Cooks v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2024) caed “Plaintiff claims their actions and omissions were not the 16 result of the exercise of discretion because they “are not vested with discretion to contravene 17 federal or state law, including § 8 U.S.C. § 1382 (a), California Health and Safety Code section 18 11369, and…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.