8 U.S.C. § 1402
Persons born in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899
All persons born in Puerto Rico on or after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Sessions v. Morales-Santana
Sessions v. Morales-Santana (2017)
“953 (a predecessor to 8 U.S.C. § 1402 ). After living in Puerto Rico for nearly two decades, José left his childhood home on February 27, 1919, 20 days short of his 19th birthday, therefore failing to satisfy § 1401(a)(7)'s requirement of five years' physical presence after age…”
Harris v. Rosario (1980)
“2, "may treat Puerto *653 Rico differently from States so long as there is a rational basis for its actions." Ante, at 651-652. No authority is cited for this proposition.”
Castro v. Attorney General of United States (2012)
“See 8 U.S.C. § 1402 . The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Castro’s motion to reconsider the issue of whether Castro in fact claimed to be a citizen of the United States.”
Jose Napoleon Marquez-Almanzar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2005)
“951 (1917) (current version codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1402 ). The people of Guam became citizens of the United States by virtue of the Organic Act of Guam, ch.”
Igartua-de-La-Rosa v. United States (2000)
“8 U.S.C. § 1402 (1999) (governing the citizenship of persons born in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899).”
Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Carmen M. Rivera Vazquez, Etc. (1992)
“8 U.S.C. § 1402 . The United States guarantees Puerto Rico a republican form of government and Puerto Rico is bound to respect the rights, privileges and immunities of all citizens.”
United States v. Vaello-Madero (2020)
“953 , § 5 (1917), and subsequent legislation granting birthright citizenship to Puerto Rico's native-born inhabitants, see 8 U.S.C. § 1402 . In 1985, Appellee moved to New York where he resided until 2013.”
Morales v. NYS Department of Labor (2012)
“See 8 U.S.C. § 1402 (extending United States citizenship to all persons born in Puerto Rico).”
Consejo De Salud Playa De Ponce v. Rullan (2008)
“8 U.S.C. § 1402 . 13 . The Court described Puerto Rico as a “distant ocean community] of a different origin and language from [that] of our continental people.”
United States v. Madero (2019)
“8 U.S.C. § 1402 . While Rice v. Cayetano was decided by the Supreme Court on Fifteenth Amendment grounds, racial classifications are equally impermissible in the Equal Protection content, i.”
Morales-Santana v. Lynch (2015)
“951 (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1402 (1917)). He was physically present in Puerto Rico until February 27, 1919, 20 days before his nineteenth birthday, when he left Puerto Rico to work in the Dominican Republic for the South Porto Rico Sugar Company.”
Igartúa-De La Rosa v. United States (2004)
“951 (1917); 8 U.S.C. § 1402 . The right to vote is a fundamental right inherent in citizenship.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.