U.S. Code » Title 8 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION › Part Part III— Loss of Nationality

8 U.S.C. § 1482

Repealed. Pub. L. 95–432, § 1, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1955–2013 · leading case: Nwozuzu v. Holder
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nwozuzu v. Holder (2013) ca2 “It also would have unnecessarily delayed their entry into the country, making it difficult to “begin to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of eighteen years” and jeopardizing their chances of deriving citizenship from their parents.”
Pierre v. Holder (2013) ca2 “ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Petitioner Clerde Pierre, a citizen of Haiti, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) and rejecting Pierre’s claim to automatic derivative citizenship under…”
Gorsira v. Loy (2005) ctd “I am consid *463 ering the former 8 U.S.C. § 1482 and whether Gorsira’s paternity has been “established by legitimation.”
Di Portanova v. United States (1982) cc “8 U.S.C. § 1482 (1970) (repealed 1978). The plaintiff states he resided in Italy for three years after his twenty-second birthday, and argues that section 350 covers him.”
Moreno v. Toll (1980) mdd “§ 1484 deals with the circumstances under which a naturalized national may lose his United States citizenship due to continuous residence in a foreign state.”
Joseph Stacher v. United States (1958) ca9 “The weight and value of the other exhibits was subject to argument, but this did not make them inadmissible. The trial court repeatedly and carefully recognized this, and we find no error that was prejudicial, either in the introduction of evidence or in other rulings made by…”
Urzua v. Urzua (1960) nm “Further, loss of American citizenship, under the conditions present here, is controlled by 8 U.S.C.A. § 1482 , which states: “A person who acquired at birth the nationality of the United States and of a foreign state and who has voluntarily sought or claimed benefits of the…”
Mitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State (1956) ca9 “Sections 802 and 801(c) were repealed by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 and are now covered by 8 U.S. C.A. §§ 1482 and 1481(a) (3) respectively.”
John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United States v. Sukejiro Katamoto (1958) ca9 “e outside of the jurisdiction of the United States of a parent who was born in the United States, shall be pre~ sumed to have expatriated himself under subsection (c) or (d) of section 801, when he shall remain for six months or longer within any foreign state of which he or…”
Schneider v. Rusk (1963) dcd · cites it 4× “See also 8 U.S.C. § 1482 regarding dual nationals.”
Fletes-Mora v. Rogers (1958) casd “See: 8 U.S.C.A. § 1482 ; To-moya Kawakita v. United States, supra, 343 U.”
Grauert v. Dulles (1955) dcd “Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1482 .”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.