8 U.S.C. § 1753

Joint United States-Canada projects for alternative inspections services

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 8 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In general

United States border inspections agencies, including the Immigration and Naturalization Service, acting jointly and under an agreement of cooperation with the Government of Canada, may conduct joint United States-Canada inspections projects on the international border between the two countries. Each such project may provide alternative inspections services and shall undertake to harmonize the criteria for inspections applied by the two countries in implementing those projects.

(b) Annual report

The Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury shall prepare and submit annually to Congress a report on the joint United States-Canada inspections projects conducted under subsection (a).

Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5 (commonly referred to as the “Administrative Procedure Act”) and chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly referred to as the “Paperwork Reduction Act”) shall not apply to fee setting for services and other administrative requirements relating to projects described in subsection (a), except that fees and forms established for such projects shall be published as a notice in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 107–173, title IV, § 404, May 14, 2002, 116 Stat. 560.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesAbolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2025 · leading case: Borowski v. Customs and Border Protection

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Borowski v. Customs and Border Protection (2024) nywd · cites it 2× “5 Here, the language of 8 U.S.C. § 1753 , the authorizing statute for the NEXUS program, is relatively broad and does not outline an individual’s eligibility for the program, nor does it explicitly preclude judicial review.”

MacLeod v. United States Department of Homeland Security (2017) dcd “at 42–44 (describing the NEXUS program, which is administered jointly with Canada pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1753 and is one of CBP’s voluntary “Trusted Traveler” programs).”

Eteros Technologies USA Inc v. United States (2025) wawd “Indeed, the authorizing statute for the NEXUS program, 8 U.S.C. § 1753 , does not specify the 3 eligibility requirements for the program, nor does it expressly preclude judicial review.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.