8 U.S.C. § 220
Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1928–2009 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Jelic v. Dist. Dir. of Immigr. & Naturalization, Ellis Island, 106 F.2d 14 (2d Cir. 1939).
United States Ex Rel. Jelic v. Dist. Dir. of Immigr. & Naturalization, Ellis Island, 106 F.2d 14 (2d Cir. 1939). “The order was placed on the ground "that the alien admits the commission of crimes involving moral turpitude, namely, forgery and violation of Section 22(b) of the Immigration Act of 1924 [ 8 U.S.C.A. § 220 (b)], to wit: personation of another.”
United States v. Elzahabi, 557 F.3d 879 (8th Cir. 2009). “The defendant in Rubenstein was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 220 (c), the precursor to 18 *886 U.”
Kelly v. United States Ex Rel. Frad, 89 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1937). “Code, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 220 , 221 ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 88 ), and appellee was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment and to pay a $1,000 fine for which he was to stand committed until paid;1 indictment C-^O — 944 charged in five counts the use of passports obtained by false statements as…”
United States v. Daniel S. Gahagan, 881 F.2d 1380 (6th Cir. 1989). “§ 180 (a), which made it an offense to gain entry to the United States by making a willfully false or misleading representation, and conspiracy to violate 8 U.S.C. § 220 (c) by knowingly making a false statement in any document required by the immigration laws.”
Impiriale v. Perkins, 66 F.2d 805 (D.C. Cir. 1933). “municado for some days, denying him the aid and advice of friends and counsel, with no charge pending against him; and that the Secretary, her assistants, agents, attorneys, and inspectors “propose and intend to use the foregoing evidence, documents, and papers so unfairly,…”
United States Ex Rel. Pantano v. Corsi, 65 F.2d 322 (2d Cir. 1933). “His brief asserts that, after his testimony before the board of special inquiry, he was indicted for violation of section 22 of the Immigration Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 220), based on the fraudulent reentry permit, and during the pendency of this criminal proceeding was released on…”
United States v. Vargas, 380 F. Supp. 1162 (E.D.N.Y 1974). “This provision was codified in 8 U.S.C. § 220 (1940). In 1948 it was transferred to 18 U.”
Camardo v. Tillinghast, 29 F.2d 527 (1st Cir. 1928). “165, § 22 [8 USCA § 220]). On April 7,1927, a hearing was held before the Board of Special Inquiry, at which time, in answer to questions propounded by the board, the applicant testified that his name was Antonio Camardo; that he was 50 years of age, being bom May 17, 1877, at…”
United States v. Mouyas, 42 F.2d 743 (S.D.N.Y. 1930). “Section 22(b) of the statute (8 USCA § 220 (b); 43 Stat. 165 ) provides that “any individual who (1) when applying * * * for admission to the United States, personates another,” is guilty of a crime.”
United States ex rel. Fink v. Reimer, 16 F. Supp. 487 (S.D.N.Y. 1936). “In using the immigration visa obtained as a result of that false statement, the petitioner Fink when he entered the United States violated 8 U.S.C. § 220 (a) 8 U.S.C.A. § 220 (a). In personating Apfelroth when applying for the immigration visa Fink violated subdivision (b) (1)…”
Shimi Miho v. United States, 57 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1932). “” Immigration Act 1924, § 22 (b), 8 USCA § 220 (b). The charge is that the defendants conspired together to violate this provision of the statute.”
United States v. Mohamad Elzahabi (8th Cir. 2009). “4 The defendant in Rubenstein was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 220 (c), the precursor to 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.