8 U.S.C. § 601
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1941–2023 · leading case: Javier Alcarez-Garcia, AKA Garcia Javier Alcarez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Javier Alcarez-Garcia, AKA Garcia Javier Alcarez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (2002)
“This case requires us to determine whether an individual who was physically present and working in the United States for 9 months out of the year for 8 years out of a 9-year period established resi *1156 dence for that 9-year time period under section 201 -of the Nationality Act…”
Lee Hong v. Acheson (1953)
“The government contends that plaintiff lost his citizenship by an act of Congress, to wit: Section 201 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 601 . That section provides: “The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: * * * * * * “(g) A…”
Gualberto Chavez-Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions (2017)
“See 8 U.S.C. § 601 (g) (1940). A child born out of wedlock and outside the U.”
C. M. K. v. Richardson (1974)
“The plaintiff claims citizenship under Section 201 (i), 8 U.S.C. § 601 (i), of the 1940 Act. That subsection provides as follows: “A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has served or…”
Lee You Fee, by Lee Q. Pon, His Next Friend v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State (1956)
“1951; that prior to that time plaintiff had not made application for the necessary travel papers to come to the United States; and that thereafter the American Consulate at Hong Kong formally informed the plaintiff that he was no longer a citizen of the United States due to the…”
Ly Shew v. Acheson (1953)
“Her claim to citizenship must rest upon Subsections (g) and (h) of section 201 of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 601 (g), (h), 3 which supersede Section 1993 of the Revised Statutes.”
Robert Rucker v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of the United States (1977)
“1137 , 1139, 8 U.S.C. § 601 ; in 1952, the Immigration and Nationality Act, 66 Stat.”
Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath Atty. Gen. Of the United States (1952)
“The district court held him not to be the son of one Wong Yem, an American citizen, and hence not entitled to enter the United States under the provisions of 8 U.S.C.A. § 601 (c). Plaintiff was born in China in 1928 and resided there until his voyage to San Francisco,…”
Haaland v. Attorney General of the United States (1941)
“§ 6 ), and was repealed by the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 601 (c), 713 and 807, that Act expressly declares that nationality already lawfully acquired is not lost, and nationality already lost is not restored, by the repeal, 8 U.”
Tomasicchio v. Acheson (1951)
“It seems unfair to charge a layman with knowledge of intricate rules of law relating to eitizenship and nationality, when an inquiry seeking information from the proper of-Acial remains unanswered, 3 . 1 Oppenheim, International Law, 5th Ed.”
Acheson, Secretary of State of United States v. Yee King Gee (1950)
“* * *« Another provision of the 1940 Act should have preliminary notice, namely, § 201(g), 8 U.S.C.A. § 601 (g). This statute so far as here material provides: “The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: * * * “(g) A person born outside the…”
Lee Wing Hong v. Dulles (1954)
“However, the 1934 Act was superseded by the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C.A. § 601 (g) and (h). The interpretation or meaning to be ascribed to paragraphs (g) and (h) is not entirely clear.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 601(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.