9 U.S.C. § 201
Enforcement of Convention
The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 820
cases (245 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara
Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (2004)
“Recognition and enforcement of an ar-bitral award may also be refused if the competent authority in the country where recognition and enforcement is sought finds that: (a) The subject matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of that…”
ESAB Group, Incorporated v. Zurich Insurance PLC (2012)
“" 9 U.S.C. § 201 . The Convention Act then clarifies that arbitration agreements and awards arising out of commercial relationships, unless they are entirely between United States citizens and have no "reasonable relation with one or more foreign states," fall under the…”
CBF Indústria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc. (2017)
“The district court first dismissed appellants’ cause of action to enforce the foreign arbitral award on the basis that the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 201 et…”
Dapuzzo v. Globalvest Management Co., L.P. (2003)
“38, June 10, 1958 (codified at Chapter 2 of the FAA, 9 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). 3 DaPuzzo points out that, in accordance with the Convention’s enabling act (the “Enabling Act”), codified in Chapter 2 of the statute, the Court lacks authority to compel arbitration in the Bahamas…”
Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. (1974)
“If A and B were quarreling over a trademark and there was an arbitration clause in the contract, the policy of Congress in implementing the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, as it did in 9 U. S. C. § 201 et seq., would…”
Templet v. Hydrochem Inc. (2004)
“removed the case to federal court, asserting jurisdiction under the Convention of the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. X.L. Insurance Company and Primex, Ltd.”
Czarina, L.L.C. v. W. F. Poe Syndicate (2004)
“Specifically, it contends that the court erred in holding that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, reprinted, in 9 U.S.C. § 201 (historical and statutory notes) (hereinafter the Convention), requires a party invoking a…”
Ge Energy Power Conversion Fr. Sas, Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (2020)
“…the New York Con- vention, and Congress enacted implementing legislation in Chapter 2 of the FAA. See 84 Stat. 692 , 9 U. S. C. §§201– 208. Chapter 2 grants federal courts jurisdiction over ac- tions governed by the Convention, §203; establishes venue for such actions, §204;…”
Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd. (2011)
“In 1970, the United States acceded to the treaty, which was subsequently implemented by Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The Convention requires contracting states, such as the United States, to recognize written arbitration agreements…”
Dahiya v. Talmidge International, Ltd. (2004)
“1 However, I respectfully disagree with the majority's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and would conclude that we have appellate jurisdiction over the order denying arbitration and that the district court erred in refusing to order arbitration under the Convention Treaty (the…”
U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co., Ltd. (2001)
“An agreement to arbitrate exists within the meaning of the Convention and the FAA if: (1) there is a written agreement; (2) the writing provides for arbitration in the territory of a signatory of the convention; (3) the subject matter is commercial; and (4) the subject matter is…”
Sphere Drake Insurance Limited v. Clarendon National Insurance Company and Clarendon America Insurance Company (2001)
“This action technically arises under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("CREFAA"), as enforced by Chapter Two of the Federal Arbitration Act (~`FAA"), 9 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. (West 1999), because the parties reside in different…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.