Utah Code

Utah Code § 13-11-23 (2026)

Other remedies available -- Class action only as prescribed by act

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The remedies of this act are in addition to remedies otherwise available for the same conduct under state or local law, except that a class action relating to a transaction governed by this act may be brought only as prescribed by this act.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2021 · leading case: Roberts v. C.R. Eng., Inc., 321 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (D. Utah 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Roberts v. C.R. Eng., Inc., 321 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (D. Utah 2018). · cites it 6× “Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-23 (emphasis added).”

Workman v. Nagle Constr., Inc., 802 P.2d 749 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “[13] Section 13-11-23 of the Act provides that "a class action relating to a transaction governed by this act may be brought only as prescribed by this act.”

Miller v. Basic Rsch., LLC, 285 F.R.D. 647 (D. Utah 2010). · cites it 2× “; Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-23 ("The remedies of this act are in addition to remedies otherwise available for the same conduct under state or local law, except that a class action relating to a [consumer transaction] may be brought only as prescribed by this act.”

Johnson v. Blendtec (D. Utah 2020). · cites it 7× “Blendtec relies on UCSPA section 13-11-23, which is titled “Other remedies available—Class action only as prescribed by act.”

Christensen v. Johnson Smith & Assocs. (D. Utah 2021). · cites it 2× “2008) (punitive damages unlikely under the FDOCPA); Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-23 . The FDCPA does not preempt state laws, as long as the state law affords greater protection to the consumer than the FDCPA.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.