Utah Code

Utah Code § 31A-22-303 (2026)

Motor vehicle liability coverage

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to complying with the requirements of Chapter 21, Insurance Contracts in General, and Part 2, Liability Insurance in General, a policy of motor vehicle liability coverage under Subsection 31A-22-302(1)(a) shall:
name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured's address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability;
if it is an owner's policy, designate by appropriate reference all the motor vehicles on which coverage is granted, insure the person named in the policy, insure any other person using any named motor vehicle with the express or implied permission of the named insured, and, except as provided in Section 31A-22-302.5, insure any person included in Subsection (1)(a)(iii) against loss from the liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of these motor vehicles within the United States and Canada, subject to limits exclusive of interest and costs, for each motor vehicle, in amounts not less than the minimum limits specified under Section 31A-22-304; or
if it is an operator's policy, insure the person named as insured against loss from the liability imposed upon him by law for damages arising out of the insured's use of any motor vehicle not owned by him, within the same territorial limits and with the same limits of liability as in an owner's policy under Subsection (1)(a)(ii)(A);
except as provided in Section 31A-22-302.5, insure persons related to the named insured by blood, marriage, adoption, or guardianship who are residents of the named insured's household, including those who usually make their home in the same household but temporarily live elsewhere, to the same extent as the named insured;
where a claim is brought by the named insured or a person described in Subsection (1)(a)(iii), the available coverage of the policy may not be reduced or stepped-down because:
a permissive user driving a covered motor vehicle is at fault in causing an accident; or
the named insured or any of the persons described in Subsection (1)(a)(iii) driving a covered motor vehicle is at fault in causing an accident; and
cover damages or injury resulting from a covered driver of a motor vehicle who is stricken by an unforeseeable paralysis, seizure, or other unconscious condition and who is not reasonably aware that paralysis, seizure, or other unconscious condition is about to occur to the extent that a person of ordinary prudence would not attempt to continue driving.
The driver's liability under Subsection (1)(a)(v) is limited to the insurance coverage.
"Guardianship" under Subsection (1)(a)(iii) includes the relationship between a foster parent and a minor who is in the legal custody of the Division of Child and Family Services if:
the minor resides in a foster home, as defined in Section 62A-2-101, with a foster parent who is the named insured; and
the foster parent has signed to be jointly and severally liable for compensatory damages caused by the minor's operation of a motor vehicle in accordance with Section 53-3-211.
"Guardianship" as defined under this Subsection (1)(c) ceases to exist when a minor described in Subsection (1)(c)(i)(A) is no longer a resident of the named insured's household.
A policy containing motor vehicle liability coverage under Subsection 31A-22-302(1)(a) may:
provide for the prorating of the insurance under that policy with other valid and collectible insurance;
grant any lawful coverage in addition to the required motor vehicle liability coverage;
if the policy is issued to a person other than a motor vehicle business, limit the coverage afforded to a motor vehicle business or its officers, agents, or employees to the minimum limits under Section 31A-22-304, and to those instances when there is no other valid and collectible insurance with at least those limits, whether the other insurance is primary, excess, or contingent; and
if issued to a motor vehicle business, restrict coverage afforded to anyone other than the motor vehicle business or its officers, agents, or employees to the minimum limits under Section 31A-22-304, and to those instances when there is no other valid and collectible insurance with at least those limits, whether the other insurance is primary, excess, or contingent.
The liability insurance coverage of a permissive user of a motor vehicle owned by a motor vehicle business shall be primary coverage.
The liability insurance coverage of a motor vehicle business shall be secondary to the liability insurance coverage of a permissive user as specified under Subsection (2)(b)(i).
Motor vehicle liability coverage need not insure any liability:
under any workers' compensation law under Title 34A, Utah Labor Code;
resulting from bodily injury to or death of an employee of the named insured, other than a domestic employee, while engaged in the employment of the insured, or while engaged in the operation, maintenance, or repair of a designated vehicle; or
resulting from damage to property owned by, rented to, bailed to, or transported by the insured.
An insurance carrier providing motor vehicle liability coverage has the right to settle any claim covered by the policy, and if the settlement is made in good faith, the amount of the settlement is deductible from the limits of liability specified under Section 31A-22-304.
A policy containing motor vehicle liability coverage imposes on the insurer the duty to defend, in good faith, any person insured under the policy against any claim or suit seeking damages which would be payable under the policy.
If a policy containing motor vehicle liability coverage provides an insurer with the defense of lack of cooperation on the part of the insured, that defense is not effective against a third person making a claim against the insurer, unless there was collusion between the third person and the insured.
If the defense of lack of cooperation is not effective against the claimant, after payment, the insurer is subrogated to the injured person's claim against the insured to the extent of the payment and is entitled to reimbursement by the insured after the injured third person has been made whole with respect to the claim against the insured.
A policy of motor vehicle coverage may limit coverage to the policy minimum limits under Section 31A-22-304 if the policy or a specifically reduced premium was extended to the insured upon express written declaration executed by the insured that the insured motor vehicle would not be operated by a person described in Subsection (7)(c) operating in a manner described in Subsection (7)(b)(i).
A policy of motor vehicle liability coverage may limit coverage as described in Subsection (7)(a) if the insured motor vehicle is operated by an individual described in Subsection (7)(c) if the individual described in Subsection (7)(c) is guilty of:
driving under the influence as described in Section 41-6a-502;
impaired driving as described in Section 41-6a-502.5; or
operating a vehicle with a measurable controlled substance in the individual's body as described in Section 41-6a-517.
An individual's refusal to submit to a chemical test as described in Sections 41-6a-520 and 41-6a-520.1 is admissible evidence, but not conclusive, that the individual is guilty of an offense described in Subsection (7)(b)(i).
A reduction in coverage as described in Subsection (7)(a) applies to the following individuals:
the insured;
the spouse of the insured; or
if the individual has a separate policy as a secondary source of coverage, and:
the individual is over the age of 21 and resides in the household of the insured; or
the individual is a permissible user of the motor vehicle.
A reduction in coverage as described in Subsection (7)(a) does not apply to an individual under the age of 21 who is a relative of the insured and a resident of the insured's household.
When a claim is brought exclusively by a named insured or a person described in Subsection (1)(a)(iii) and asserted exclusively against a named insured or an individual described in Subsection (1)(a)(iii), the claimant may elect to resolve the claim:
by submitting the claim to binding arbitration; or
through litigation.
Once the claimant has elected to commence litigation under Subsection (8)(a)(ii), the claimant may not elect to resolve the claim through binding arbitration under this section without the written consent of both parties and the defendant's liability insurer.
Unless otherwise agreed on in writing by the parties, a claim that is submitted to binding arbitration under Subsection (8)(a)(i) shall be resolved by a panel of three arbitrators.
Unless otherwise agreed on in writing by the parties, each party shall select an arbitrator. The arbitrators selected by the parties shall select a third arbitrator.
Unless otherwise agreed on in writing by the parties, each party will pay the fees and costs of the arbitrator that party selects. Both parties shall share equally the fees and costs of the third arbitrator.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, an arbitration procedure conducted under this section shall be governed by Title 78B, Chapter 11, Utah Uniform Arbitration Act, unless otherwise agreed on in writing by the parties.
Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with Rules 26b through 36, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.
All issues of discovery shall be resolved by the arbitration panel.
A written decision of two of the three arbitrators shall constitute a final decision of the arbitration panel.
Prior to the rendering of the arbitration award:
the existence of a liability insurance policy may be disclosed to the arbitration panel; and
the amount of all applicable liability insurance policy limits may not be disclosed to the arbitration panel.
The amount of the arbitration award may not exceed the liability limits of all the defendant's applicable liability insurance policies, including applicable liability umbrella policies. If the initial arbitration award exceeds the liability limits of all applicable liability insurance policies, the arbitration award shall be reduced to an amount equal to the liability limits of all applicable liability insurance policies.
The arbitration award is the final resolution of all claims between the parties unless the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means.
If the arbitration panel finds that the action was not brought, pursued, or defended in good faith, the arbitration panel may award reasonable fees and costs against the party that failed to bring, pursue, or defend the claim in good faith.
Nothing in this section is intended to limit any claim under any other portion of an applicable insurance policy.
An at-fault driver or an insurer issuing a policy of insurance under this part that is covering an at-fault driver may not reduce compensation to an injured party based on the injured party not being covered by a policy of insurance that provides personal injury protection coverage under Sections 31A-22-306 through 31A-22-309.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004).
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). · cites it 46× “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
Lancer Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore Motor Coach Lines, Inc., 2017 UT 8 (Utah 2017). · cites it 32× “(Lake Shore’s insurer) was strictly liable for the passengers’ injuries under Utah Code section 31A-22-303(1). Those motions were denied.”
Cullum v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 857 P.2d 922 (Utah 1993). · cites it 30× “They argue that the step-down clause (1) violates Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303, which permits an insurer to provide step-down coverage only in certain circumstances, (2) violates Utah Code Ann.”
Arredondo v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., Inc., 2001 UT 29 (Utah 2001). · cites it 14× “Section 31A-22-302 provided, in relevant part, as follows: (1) Every policy of insurance or combination of policies purchased to satisfy the owner's or operator's security requirement of Section 41-12a-301 shall include: (a) motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections…”
Dairyland Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 882 P.2d 1143 (Utah 1994). · cites it 30× “was entitled to coverage as a permissive user pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s partial denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mastbaum, 748 P.2d 1042 (Utah 1987). · cites it 16× “Two sections in particular are relevant to this discussion: first, Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (motor vehicle liability coverage), which generally describes motor vehicle liability coverage required under the statutory scheme, and second, section 31A-22-309 (limitations,…”
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). · cites it 11× “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
Wagner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 786 P.2d 763 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 12× “§§ 41 -12a-101 to -606 (1986), [6] and Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-301 to -310. [7] The Financial Responsibility Act mandates minimum liability coverage conforming to the requirements set forth in Utah Code Ann.”
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). · cites it 8× “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 925 P.2d 1270 (Utah Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 39× “Furthermore, insurance policies purchased to satisfy the owner’s or operator’s security requirement of section 41-12a-301(2) must include the coverage required by Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (1994). Id. § 31A-22-302(l)(a).”
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Ewart, 2007 UT 52 (Utah 2007). · cites it 9× “" [7] And the insurance policy purchased by an owner to satisfy this requirement must include "motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections 31A-22-303 and 31A-22-304." [8] Section 31A-22-303 requires a policy to "insure .”
Jones v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Companies, 738 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “(Vernon 1999): Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-303 and 31A-22-304 (2005); Va.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1) — 2 cases
Lancer Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore Motor Coach Lines, Inc., 2017 UT 8 (Utah 2017). “(Lake Shore’s insurer) was strictly liable for the passengers’ injuries under Utah Code section 31A-22-303(1). Those motions were denied.”
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a) — 3 cases
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Shores, 147 P.3d 456 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
Kingston v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 2015 UT App 28 (Utah Ct. App. 2015).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(H)(A) — 1 case
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(ii) — 1 case
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(ii)(A) — 5 cases
Arredondo v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., Inc., 2001 UT 29 (Utah 2001). “Section 31A-22-302 provided, in relevant part, as follows: (1) Every policy of insurance or combination of policies purchased to satisfy the owner's or operator's security requirement of Section 41-12a-301 shall include: (a) motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections…”
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Ewart, 2007 UT 52 (Utah 2007). “" [7] And the insurance policy purchased by an owner to satisfy this requirement must include "motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections 31A-22-303 and 31A-22-304." [8] Section 31A-22-303 requires a policy to "insure .”
Auto Owners Ins. v. Clayton (D. Utah 2023).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(ii)(B) — 1 case
Arredondo v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., Inc., 2001 UT 29 (Utah 2001). “Section 31A-22-302 provided, in relevant part, as follows: (1) Every policy of insurance or combination of policies purchased to satisfy the owner's or operator's security requirement of Section 41-12a-301 shall include: (a) motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(iii) — 3 cases
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Shores, 147 P.3d 456 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(iii)(A) — 1 case
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(iv)(B) — 1 case
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Shores, 147 P.3d 456 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(a)(v) — 1 case
Lancer Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore Motor Coach Lines, Inc., 2017 UT 8 (Utah 2017). “(Lake Shore’s insurer) was strictly liable for the passengers’ injuries under Utah Code section 31A-22-303(1). Those motions were denied.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(b) — 2 cases
Lancer Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore Motor Coach Lines, Inc., 2017 UT 8 (Utah 2017). “(Lake Shore’s insurer) was strictly liable for the passengers’ injuries under Utah Code section 31A-22-303(1). Those motions were denied.”
Wagner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 786 P.2d 763 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). “§§ 41 -12a-101 to -606 (1986), [6] and Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-301 to -310. [7] The Financial Responsibility Act mandates minimum liability coverage conforming to the requirements set forth in Utah Code Ann.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(b)(i) — 2 cases
Cullum v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 857 P.2d 922 (Utah 1993). “They argue that the step-down clause (1) violates Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303, which permits an insurer to provide step-down coverage only in certain circumstances, (2) violates Utah Code Ann.”
Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 925 P.2d 1270 (Utah Ct. App. 1996). “Furthermore, insurance policies purchased to satisfy the owner’s or operator’s security requirement of section 41-12a-301(2) must include the coverage required by Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (1994). Id. § 31A-22-302(l)(a).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(1)(c) — 3 cases
Arredondo v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., Inc., 2001 UT 29 (Utah 2001). “Section 31A-22-302 provided, in relevant part, as follows: (1) Every policy of insurance or combination of policies purchased to satisfy the owner's or operator's security requirement of Section 41-12a-301 shall include: (a) motor vehicle liability coverage under Sections…”
Wagner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 786 P.2d 763 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). “§§ 41 -12a-101 to -606 (1986), [6] and Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-301 to -310. [7] The Financial Responsibility Act mandates minimum liability coverage conforming to the requirements set forth in Utah Code Ann.”
Cullum v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 857 P.2d 922 (Utah 1993). “They argue that the step-down clause (1) violates Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303, which permits an insurer to provide step-down coverage only in certain circumstances, (2) violates Utah Code Ann.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2) — 1 case
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2)(a) — 2 cases
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(iii) — 1 case
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2)(b) — 1 case
Li v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co. of Utah, 2006 UT 80 (Utah 2006). “§ 31A-22-303(1)(@)Gi)(A). 35 . Id. § 31A-22-303(2)(a)(@i), (ii).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2)(c) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(2)(d) — 1 case
Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 925 P.2d 1270 (Utah Ct. App. 1996). “Furthermore, insurance policies purchased to satisfy the owner’s or operator’s security requirement of section 41-12a-301(2) must include the coverage required by Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (1994). Id. § 31A-22-302(l)(a).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(3) — 2 cases
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mastbaum, 748 P.2d 1042 (Utah 1987). “Two sections in particular are relevant to this discussion: first, Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (motor vehicle liability coverage), which generally describes motor vehicle liability coverage required under the statutory scheme, and second, section 31A-22-309 (limitations,…”
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(3)(b) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(5) — 2 cases
Farm Bureau v. Weston, 2023 UT App 136 (Utah Ct. App. 2023).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(6) — 1 case
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(7) — 4 cases
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
Dairyland Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 882 P.2d 1143 (Utah 1994). “was entitled to coverage as a permissive user pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s partial denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Afridi v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 122 P.3d 596 (Utah 2005).
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Shores, 147 P.3d 456 (Utah Ct. App. 2006).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(8) — 1 case
Speros v. Fricke, 2004 UT 69 (Utah 2004). “4 The parties dispute whether Hiatt's actions were covered under the policy provision protecting a person "who is legally responsible for the use of your auto and uses it with your permission." 132 The default judgment against Hiatt established that he was "legally responsible"…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l) — 1 case
Lancer Ins. Co. v. Lake Shore Motor Coach Lines, Inc., 2017 UT 8 (Utah 2017). “(Lake Shore’s insurer) was strictly liable for the passengers’ injuries under Utah Code section 31A-22-303(1). Those motions were denied.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(a)(i) — 1 case
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(a)(ii)(A) — 1 case
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(a)(ii)(B) — 1 case
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(a)(iii) — 2 cases
Calhoun v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2004 UT 56 (Utah 2004). “And section 31A-22-303 states that a policy shall (i) name the motor vehicle owner or operator in whose name the policy was purchased, state that named insured’s address, the coverage afforded, the premium charged, the policy period, and the limits of liability; (ii) (A) if it…”
Krehbiel v. Travelers Ins. Co., 387 F. App'x 827 (10th Cir. 2010).
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(b) — 1 case
Wagner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 786 P.2d 763 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). “§§ 41 -12a-101 to -606 (1986), [6] and Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-301 to -310. [7] The Financial Responsibility Act mandates minimum liability coverage conforming to the requirements set forth in Utah Code Ann.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(b)(i) — 3 cases
Dairyland Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 882 P.2d 1143 (Utah 1994). “was entitled to coverage as a permissive user pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s partial denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Cullum v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 857 P.2d 922 (Utah 1993). “They argue that the step-down clause (1) violates Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303, which permits an insurer to provide step-down coverage only in certain circumstances, (2) violates Utah Code Ann.”
Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 925 P.2d 1270 (Utah Ct. App. 1996). “Furthermore, insurance policies purchased to satisfy the owner’s or operator’s security requirement of section 41-12a-301(2) must include the coverage required by Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303 (1994). Id. § 31A-22-302(l)(a).”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(c) — 3 cases
Dairyland Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 882 P.2d 1143 (Utah 1994). “was entitled to coverage as a permissive user pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s partial denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Wagner v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 786 P.2d 763 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). “§§ 41 -12a-101 to -606 (1986), [6] and Utah Code Ann. §§ 31A-22-301 to -310. [7] The Financial Responsibility Act mandates minimum liability coverage conforming to the requirements set forth in Utah Code Ann.”
Cullum v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 857 P.2d 922 (Utah 1993). “They argue that the step-down clause (1) violates Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303, which permits an insurer to provide step-down coverage only in certain circumstances, (2) violates Utah Code Ann.”
— Utah Code § 31A-22-303(l)(e) — 1 case
Dairyland Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 882 P.2d 1143 (Utah 1994). “was entitled to coverage as a permissive user pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-303. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s partial denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.