Utah Code

Utah Code § 57-1-14 (2026)

Form of mortgage -- Effect

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A mortgage of land may be substantially in the following form:

MORTGAGE____ (here insert name), mortgagor, of ____ (insert place of residence), hereby mortgages to ____ (insert name), mortgagee, of ____ (insert place of residence), for the sum of ____ dollars, the following described tract ____ of land in ____ County, Utah, to wit: (here describe the premises).This mortgage is given to secure the following indebtedness (here state amount and form of indebtedness, maturity, rate of interest, by and to whom payable, and where).The mortgagor agrees to pay all taxes and assessments on said premises, and the sum of ____ dollars attorney fee in case of foreclosure.Witness the hand of said mortgagor this __________(month\day\year).

A mortgage when executed as required by law shall have the effect of a conveyance of the land therein described, together with all the rights, privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging, to the mortgagee, the mortgagee's heirs, assigns, and legal representatives, as security for the payment of the indebtedness thereon set forth, with covenants from the mortgagor of general warranty of title, and that all taxes and assessments levied and assessed upon the land described, during the continuance of the mortgage, will be paid previous to the day appointed for the sale of such lands for taxes; and may be foreclosed as provided by law upon any default being made in any of the conditions thereof as to payment of either principal, interest, taxes, or assessments.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: Gen. Glass Corp. v. Mast Constr. Co., 766 P.2d 429 (Utah Ct. App. 1988).
Gen. Glass Corp. v. Mast Constr. Co., 766 P.2d 429 (Utah Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Although Utah Code Ann. § 57-1-14 (1986) sets forth a land mortgage form that may be used which includes spaces for insertion of the amount and terms of the debt, no particular form is necessary as long as the writing shows the intention of the parties to create a valid legal…”
Rothe v. Rothe, 787 P.2d 534 (Utah Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “On appeal, defendant concedes that the note between him and his father fails to qualify as a legal mortgage under Utah Code Ann. § 57-1-14 (1986). However, defendant claims the trial court erred in (1) failing to reform the divorce decree to reflect the intention of the parties;…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.